From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8073
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Wesley.Hardaker@sphys.unil.ch
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Vegetable Gnus
Date: 27 Sep 1996 15:06:50 +0200
Organization: Universite de Lausanne, BSP
Sender: whardake@iptsun2.unil.ch
Message-ID: <qk27mpgm7it.fsf@iptsun2.unil.ch>
References: <w8sohitqe55.fsf@hler.ifi.uio.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148294 9988 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:11:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:11:34 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.6/8.6.9) with SMTP id GAA03599 for <steve@miranova.com>; Fri, 27 Sep 1996 06:45:24 -0700
Original-Received: from cisun29e.unil.ch (cisun29e.unil.ch [130.223.8.29]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <PAA07309@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Fri, 27 Sep 1996 15:08:09 +0200
Original-Received: from iptsun2.unil.ch by cisun29e with SMTP inbound;
          Fri, 27 Sep 1996 15:08:02 +0200
Original-Received: by iptsun2.unil.ch (5.x/Unil-3.1/) id AA22928;
          Fri, 27 Sep 1996 15:06:51 +0200
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
X-Face: #qW^}a%m*T^{A:Cp}$R\"38+d}41-Z}uU8,r%F#c#s:~Nzp0G9](s?,K49KJ]s"*7gvRgA 
        SrAvQc4@/}L7Qc=w{)]ACO\R{LF@S{pXfojjjGg6c;q6{~C}CxC^^&~(F]`1W)%9j/iS/ 
        IM",B1M.?{w8ckLTYD'`|kTr\i\cgY)P4
X-Url: http://www.ece.ucdavis.edu/~hardaker
In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 26 Sep 1996 21:17:58 +0200
Original-Lines: 10
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.42/XEmacs 19.14
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8073
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8073

Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no> writes:

> Perhaps we should get a biiig list of fruits and vegetables?  Does
> anybody have one handy?
> 
> The finalists now seem to be Mango, Potato and Kiwi -- the last one
> was very succintly and convincingly argued for: "Kiwi! Kiwi! Kiwi!".

I suppose "egg-plant gnus" is out of the question?