From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8341 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Wesley.Hardaker@sphys.unil.ch Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Adaptive scoring in nnml groups Date: 11 Oct 1996 15:32:11 +0100 Organization: Universite de Lausanne, BSP Sender: whardake@iptsun2.unil.ch Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148517 11555 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:15:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:15:17 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 5957 invoked from smtpd); 11 Oct 1996 15:17:55 -0000 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2) by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 11 Oct 1996 15:17:54 -0000 Original-Received: from cisun29e.unil.ch (cisun29e.unil.ch [130.223.8.29]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Fri, 11 Oct 1996 16:33:41 +0200 Original-Received: from iptsun2.unil.ch by cisun29e with SMTP inbound; Fri, 11 Oct 1996 16:33:26 +0200 Original-Received: by iptsun2.unil.ch (5.x/Unil-3.1/) id AA17564; Fri, 11 Oct 1996 15:32:12 +0100 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no X-Face: #qW^}a%m*T^{A:Cp}$R\"38+d}41-Z}uU8,r%F#c#s:~Nzp0G9](s?,K49KJ]s"*7gvRgA SrAvQc4@/}L7Qc=w{)]ACO\R{LF@S{pXfojjjGg6c;q6{~C}CxC^^&~(F]`1W)%9j/iS/ IM",B1M.?{w8ckLTYD'`|kTr\i\cgY)P4 X-Url: http://www.ece.ucdavis.edu/~hardaker In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 11 Oct 1996 15:13:04 +0200 Original-Lines: 32 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.49/XEmacs 19.14 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8341 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8341 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > I don't know how to fix it. The adaptive thingies do their work based > on article marks, and using auto-expiry will mean that all articles > get the same mark. Grr.... Hmm... The person that found it (sorry... I've forgotten your name already) was right... We need to run the adaptive stuff before the expiratory stuff... Either that or make it possible for an article to be both read and expired. That way you could deduct on expired articles and increase on expired and read... Of course, I don't have any clue how this is currently handled, so I'm sure its probably impossible to have two marks... Hmmm... Hmm.... There must be a way. There has got to be a way... I need to go home... Its too late to be here on a friday... Must breath... (sorry) Wes