Re: Feedback on new Customization

[Wesley.Hardaker@sphys.unil.ch]

Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk> writes:

> Using groups would be the wrong mechanism.  Each customization option
> can belong to any number of groups, from zero and upward.  The same is
> true for the groups, so the result is not a nice hierarchy, but a
> directed graph.  It can even be cyclic.

Speaking of groups...

One of the problems with customization as exsists at the moment is
that you won't see new options until the appropriate file is
loaded...  IE, until a function is actually called and autoload loads
the file, the customization vars aren't found for that section.  

The only solution I can see for this is to define the groups in a
different file (all of them in one maybe) and then tell each group
which file to load when its visiblity is toggled...  Ugly...  Hard to
implement...  Makes you keep track of files when you shouldn't...
Bad...

Any other ideas?
Forget it?
Wes