From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/7586
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Wesley.Hardaker@sphys.unil.ch
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Picon related bugs--anyone else see these?
Date: 14 Aug 1996 08:24:02 +0200
Sender: whardake@iptsun2.unil.ch
Message-ID: <qk2d90uo54t.fsf@iptsun2.unil.ch>
References: <m220hefsnq.fsf_-_@atreides.erehwon.org> <qk2d90xjf0y.fsf@sphys.unil.ch> <m2ohkgks4c.fsf@atreides.erehwon.org> <tjhgq7hcrd.fsf@sfs.nphil.uni-tuebingen.de> <qk2wwz34fxv.fsf@iptsun2.unil.ch>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035147878 7716 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:04:38 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:04:38 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: John Griffith <griffith@sfs.nphil.uni-tuebingen.de>,
        Sudish Joseph <sudish@mindspring.com>, ding@ifi.uio.no
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id XAA02683 for <steve@miranova.com>; Tue, 13 Aug 1996 23:49:03 -0700
Original-Received: from uldns1.unil.ch (uldns1.unil.ch [130.223.8.20]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <IAA24934@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Wed, 14 Aug 1996 08:25:21 +0200
Original-Received: from iptsun2.unil.ch (actually iptsun2) by uldns1 with SMTP (PP);
          Wed, 14 Aug 1996 08:25:03 +0200
Original-Received: by iptsun2.unil.ch (5.x/Unil-3.1/) id AA26040;
          Wed, 14 Aug 1996 08:24:03 +0200
Original-To: Wesley.Hardaker@sphys.unil.ch
In-Reply-To: Wesley.Hardaker@sphys.unil.ch's message of 13 Aug 1996 14:38:36 +0200
Original-Lines: 16
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.11/XEmacs 19.14
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:7586
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:7586

Wesley.Hardaker@sphys.unil.ch writes:

> Well, XEmacs isn't really much of a picture editor, so its not on its
> high speed priority list.  However, yes, loading it over NFS will
> definately make it worse.  Also, elisp is not really the best language
> for speed either, so you'll loose some there as well.  However, there
> is not much that can be done to speed things up, so I'm afraid you're
> stuck for now...

Another speed up is to display the picons buffer in a seperate emacs
frame, not controlled by gnus.  This way gnus draws the
summary/article (and whatever else) really quickly and the icons seem
to actually get drawn after everything else, allowing you to read the
article quickly.

Wes