From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9366 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Wesley.Hardaker@sphys.unil.ch Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Acronym lookups Date: 10 Jan 1997 10:01:33 +0100 Organization: Universite de Lausanne, BSP Sender: whardake@iptsun2.unil.ch Message-ID: References: <199701091928.LAA10033@newman> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149403 18064 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:30:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:30:03 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id BAA09363 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 1997 01:14:16 -0800 Original-Received: from unilmta3.unil.ch (cisun29.unil.ch [130.223.27.29]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Fri, 10 Jan 1997 10:03:34 +0100 Original-Received: from iptsun2.unil.ch by unilmta3.unil.ch with SMTP inbound; Fri, 10 Jan 1997 10:03:15 +0100 Original-Received: by iptsun2.unil.ch (5.x/Unil-3.1/) id AA09923; Fri, 10 Jan 1997 10:01:34 +0100 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no X-Face: #qW^}a%m*T^{A:Cp}$R\"38+d}41-Z}uU8,r%F#c#s:~Nzp0G9](s?,K49KJ]s"*7gvRgA SrAvQc4@/}L7Qc=w{)]ACO\R{LF@S{pXfojjjGg6c;q6{~C}CxC^^&~(F]`1W)%9j/iS/ IM",B1M.?{w8ckLTYD'`|kTr\i\cgY)P4 X-Url: http://www.ece.ucdavis.edu/~hardaker In-Reply-To: "William M. Perry"'s message of Thu, 9 Jan 1997 11:28:36 -0800 Original-Lines: 23 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.80/XEmacs 19.14 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9366 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9366 >>>>> "William" == William M Perry writes: William> This has been bothering me a bit lately. Lars (GNUS), Kyle William> (VM), and I (W3) seem to be reimplementing a lot of the same William> functionality. Notably base64 decoding, md5, POP William> functionality, rot13, etc, etc. Well, I do agree with this of course! Heck, thats one of the reasons that oo is so popular with the theoretical crowd, its supposed to support this type of re-use. The reason I figured I'd just submit it here was that it would get included with both Emacs and XEmacs since they both follow gnus. XEmacs keeps track of a bunch of packages, but Emacs doesn't and gnus is but one of a minor few so I thought if it was going to add a key binding for it it should be shipped with it... Then if something like VM or W3 wants to add a keybinding as well, thats no problem as just because its in the gnus sub-dir in the load path, it can still find it... Gnus is shipped with both packages? Make Sense? I thought not... Doesn't to me much either... Wes