From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9141
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Wesley.Hardaker@sphys.unil.ch
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Feature request: display group parameter
Date: 09 Dec 1996 09:16:58 +0100
Organization: Universite de Lausanne, BSP
Sender: whardake@iptsun2.unil.ch
Message-ID: <qk2hglw169x.fsf@iptsun2.unil.ch>
References: <qk2hgm2211j.fsf@iptsun2.unil.ch> <m2hgm0red2.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no> <qk2zpzs2hw4.fsf@iptsun2.unil.ch> <m2g21j6guv.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149210 16690 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:26:50 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:26:50 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
          by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id AAA11230 for <steve@miranova.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 00:29:49 -0800
Original-Received: from unilmta3.unil.ch (cisun29a.unil.ch [130.223.27.29]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <JAA11015@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 09:18:36 +0100
Original-Received: from iptsun2.unil.ch by unilmta3.unil.ch with SMTP inbound;
          Mon, 9 Dec 1996 09:18:28 +0100
Original-Received: by iptsun2.unil.ch (5.x/Unil-3.1/) id AA29392;
          Mon, 9 Dec 1996 09:16:59 +0100
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
X-Face: #qW^}a%m*T^{A:Cp}$R\"38+d}41-Z}uU8,r%F#c#s:~Nzp0G9](s?,K49KJ]s"*7gvRgA 
        SrAvQc4@/}L7Qc=w{)]ACO\R{LF@S{pXfojjjGg6c;q6{~C}CxC^^&~(F]`1W)%9j/iS/ 
        IM",B1M.?{w8ckLTYD'`|kTr\i\cgY)P4
X-Url: http://www.ece.ucdavis.edu/~hardaker
In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 06 Dec 1996 12:40:24 +0100
Original-Lines: 24
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.73/XEmacs 19.14
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9141
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9141


So I just tried this randomly:

(dummy
 (progn
   (make-local-hook 'gnus-summary-prepare-hook)
   (add-hook 'gnus-summary-prepare-hook '(lambda nil
		    (gnus-summary-limit-exclude-marks "E"))))))

Which didn't work...  First off, I think make-local-hook also needs a
call to make-local-variable as well, but I'm not positive...

Anyway, the worse problem is that as far as I can figure this is the
right hook to use, as the others are too early in the summary
generation process and gnus-summary-limit-exclude-marks is expected to
be run after the generation, not before...

What happens is that gnus-summary-limit-exclude-marks gets run and
then the summary buffer gets re-generated and
gnus-summary-prepare-hook gets run once again!  (ie, inf loop).

Wheee...

Wes