From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8785
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Wesley.Hardaker@sphys.unil.ch
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Discussion: To del cached articles upon zapping group info?
Date: 14 Nov 1996 14:32:29 +0100
Organization: Universite de Lausanne, BSP
Sender: whardake@iptsun2.unil.ch
Message-ID: <qk2hgms3iqa.fsf@iptsun2.unil.ch>
References: <199611131650.LAA17750@alderaan.gsfc.nasa.gov> <rvd8xh3lfh.fsf@sdnp5.ucsd.edu> <m2zq0lrqxr.fsf@proletcult.ifi.uio.no> <rjybg5gh7n.fsf@babbage.dina.kvl.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148903 14346 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:21:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:21:43 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: (qmail 28727 invoked from smtpd); 14 Nov 1996 14:01:53 -0000
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2)
  by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 14 Nov 1996 14:01:51 -0000
Original-Received: from unilmta3.unil.ch (cisun29a.unil.ch [130.223.27.29]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <OAA29070@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Thu, 14 Nov 1996 14:34:35 +0100
Original-Received: from iptsun2.unil.ch by unilmta3.unil.ch with SMTP inbound;
          Thu, 14 Nov 1996 14:33:54 +0100
Original-Received: by iptsun2.unil.ch (5.x/Unil-3.1/) id AA14956;
          Thu, 14 Nov 1996 14:32:31 +0100
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
X-Face: #qW^}a%m*T^{A:Cp}$R\"38+d}41-Z}uU8,r%F#c#s:~Nzp0G9](s?,K49KJ]s"*7gvRgA 
        SrAvQc4@/}L7Qc=w{)]ACO\R{LF@S{pXfojjjGg6c;q6{~C}CxC^^&~(F]`1W)%9j/iS/ 
        IM",B1M.?{w8ckLTYD'`|kTr\i\cgY)P4
X-Url: http://www.ece.ucdavis.edu/~hardaker
In-Reply-To: Per Abrahamsen's message of 14 Nov 1996 10:26:52 +0100
Original-Lines: 13
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.56/XEmacs 19.14
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8785
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8785

Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk> writes:

> Maybe an explicit command to move cached articles somewhere else, and
> a warning in any action that would render cached articles invalid.

I think gnus *has* to do at least a move to get them out of the way so
it doesn't screw up in the first place, and it should at the very
least warn the user as well.  Preferably, with a prompt as a simple
message can disappear without the user actually ever seeing it whereas
a prompt will sit around till the specifically acknowledge it...

Wes