From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8763 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Wesley.Hardaker@sphys.unil.ch Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Discussion: To del cached articles upon zapping group info? Date: 13 Nov 1996 11:02:50 +0100 Organization: Universite de Lausanne, BSP Sender: whardake@iptsun2.unil.ch Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148886 14239 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:21:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:21:26 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 11750 invoked from smtpd); 13 Nov 1996 10:50:02 -0000 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2) by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 13 Nov 1996 10:49:59 -0000 Original-Received: from unilmta3.unil.ch (cisun29a.unil.ch [130.223.27.29]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Wed, 13 Nov 1996 11:04:20 +0100 Original-Received: from iptsun2.unil.ch by unilmta3.unil.ch with SMTP inbound; Wed, 13 Nov 1996 11:04:17 +0100 Original-Received: by iptsun2.unil.ch (5.x/Unil-3.1/) id AA12482; Wed, 13 Nov 1996 11:02:53 +0100 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no X-Face: #qW^}a%m*T^{A:Cp}$R\"38+d}41-Z}uU8,r%F#c#s:~Nzp0G9](s?,K49KJ]s"*7gvRgA SrAvQc4@/}L7Qc=w{)]ACO\R{LF@S{pXfojjjGg6c;q6{~C}CxC^^&~(F]`1W)%9j/iS/ IM",B1M.?{w8ckLTYD'`|kTr\i\cgY)P4 X-Url: http://www.ece.ucdavis.edu/~hardaker In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 09 Nov 1996 03:59:43 +0100 Original-Lines: 21 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.56/XEmacs 19.14 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8763 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8763 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Hm. How about just moving the cached articles to, uhm, > "~/News/cache.old/group/name", or something like that? Well, this would be fine too (ie, better than removing them and is an acceptable solution). However, it will hide them from the user will it not? IE, the user will never know to look there... This should probably be solved with some sort of warning: "Yo... You have cached articles in the groups you're wiping... What should I do with them? (del/mov/neg/abort):" with the default being mov? Sort of a pain. I think there is no way of doing something smart (without implementing the negative numbers scheme, which would be cool) without at least telling (read "warning") the user if not asking him what to do... ??? Wes