From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8777
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Wesley.Hardaker@sphys.unil.ch
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Discussion: To del cached articles upon zapping group info?
Date: 14 Nov 1996 08:20:38 +0100
Organization: Universite de Lausanne, BSP
Sender: whardake@iptsun2.unil.ch
Message-ID: <qk2iv792ldl.fsf@iptsun2.unil.ch>
References: <199611131650.LAA17750@alderaan.gsfc.nasa.gov> <rvd8xh3lfh.fsf@sdnp5.ucsd.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148897 14300 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:21:37 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:21:37 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: (qmail 27847 invoked from smtpd); 14 Nov 1996 07:42:13 -0000
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2)
  by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 14 Nov 1996 07:42:12 -0000
Original-Received: from unilmta3.unil.ch (cisun29a.unil.ch [130.223.27.29]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <IAA06448@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Thu, 14 Nov 1996 08:22:17 +0100
Original-Received: from iptsun2.unil.ch by unilmta3.unil.ch with SMTP inbound;
          Thu, 14 Nov 1996 08:22:03 +0100
Original-Received: by iptsun2.unil.ch (5.x/Unil-3.1/) id AA13640;
          Thu, 14 Nov 1996 08:20:39 +0100
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
X-Face: #qW^}a%m*T^{A:Cp}$R\"38+d}41-Z}uU8,r%F#c#s:~Nzp0G9](s?,K49KJ]s"*7gvRgA 
        SrAvQc4@/}L7Qc=w{)]ACO\R{LF@S{pXfojjjGg6c;q6{~C}CxC^^&~(F]`1W)%9j/iS/ 
        IM",B1M.?{w8ckLTYD'`|kTr\i\cgY)P4
X-Url: http://www.ece.ucdavis.edu/~hardaker
In-Reply-To: David Moore's message of 13 Nov 1996 10:21:54 -0800
Original-Lines: 19
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.56/XEmacs 19.14
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8777
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8777

David Moore <dmoore@UCSD.EDU> writes:

> 	I'm preferring the negative number scheme myself.

Lars, you want to toss in your estimate of accomplishing this
impossiblitiy?  You'd know best of course...  This is definately the
easiest way to go and the least user intrusive.

[...]

> Although, it's probably not worth it. ;)

Thats the whole problem.  We're talking about a fix for something that
is rarely done in the first place...  Its not exactly something that
Lars should spend a lot of time on, but then...  Something has to be
done too.

Ah, well...
Wes