From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8251 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Wesley.Hardaker@sphys.unil.ch Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Feedback on new Customization Date: 09 Oct 1996 10:47:32 +0100 Organization: Universite de Lausanne, BSP Sender: whardake@iptsun2.unil.ch Message-ID: References: <24453.844790128@splat.niehs.nih.gov> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148443 11015 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:14:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 5877 invoked from smtpd); 9 Oct 1996 10:20:02 -0000 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2) by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 9 Oct 1996 10:20:00 -0000 Original-Received: from cisun29e.unil.ch (cisun29e.unil.ch [130.223.8.29]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Wed, 9 Oct 1996 11:48:57 +0200 Original-Received: from iptsun2.unil.ch by cisun29e with SMTP inbound; Wed, 9 Oct 1996 11:48:48 +0200 Original-Received: by iptsun2.unil.ch (5.x/Unil-3.1/) id AA14500; Wed, 9 Oct 1996 10:47:34 +0100 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no X-Face: #qW^}a%m*T^{A:Cp}$R\"38+d}41-Z}uU8,r%F#c#s:~Nzp0G9](s?,K49KJ]s"*7gvRgA SrAvQc4@/}L7Qc=w{)]ACO\R{LF@S{pXfojjjGg6c;q6{~C}CxC^^&~(F]`1W)%9j/iS/ IM",B1M.?{w8ckLTYD'`|kTr\i\cgY)P4 X-Url: http://www.ece.ucdavis.edu/~hardaker In-Reply-To: Per Abrahamsen's message of 09 Oct 1996 01:43:49 +0200 Original-Lines: 31 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.49/XEmacs 19.14 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8251 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8251 Per Abrahamsen writes: > "Lance A. Brown" writes: > > > I *REALLY* like it. Looks cool... I like it too, but I don't mind editing straight code so its more questionable for me simply because its so slow... However, very nicely done! > The settings are saved in `.emacs', `.custom.el' is no longer used. You know, I hate things that modify my .emacs... I hate using the 'save options' menu item for that reason. Oh well, someday I had to give in (I did so for 'customize'...). Anyway, my last comment is that there are so many variables in gnus that the customize buffer is massive. It would be really nice to make it a bit more hierarchial. I don't know how difficult this is to do as I haven't glanced at the code at all. However, it would be nice to have some more 'topics', I guess they're called, to seperate the different sections a bit more. IE, under gnus-summary you could have it divided a bit more into 'threads', 'hooks', 'display', 'scoring', etc... A decent plan would be to follow the info file(s) hierarchy, which would make using custom really cool if you were reading the manual at the same time! Anyway, its probably too late to start adding more hierarchy huh? Good job though! Wes