From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9116 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Wesley.Hardaker@sphys.unil.ch Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Feature request: display group parameter Date: 06 Dec 1996 10:47:51 +0100 Organization: Universite de Lausanne, BSP Sender: whardake@iptsun2.unil.ch Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149189 16555 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:26:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:26:29 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id CAA27650 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 1996 02:02:13 -0800 Original-Received: from unilmta3.unil.ch (cisun29a.unil.ch [130.223.27.29]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Fri, 6 Dec 1996 10:49:25 +0100 Original-Received: from iptsun2.unil.ch by unilmta3.unil.ch with SMTP inbound; Fri, 6 Dec 1996 10:49:21 +0100 Original-Received: by iptsun2.unil.ch (5.x/Unil-3.1/) id AA26317; Fri, 6 Dec 1996 10:47:52 +0100 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no X-Face: #qW^}a%m*T^{A:Cp}$R\"38+d}41-Z}uU8,r%F#c#s:~Nzp0G9](s?,K49KJ]s"*7gvRgA SrAvQc4@/}L7Qc=w{)]ACO\R{LF@S{pXfojjjGg6c;q6{~C}CxC^^&~(F]`1W)%9j/iS/ IM",B1M.?{w8ckLTYD'`|kTr\i\cgY)P4 X-Url: http://www.ece.ucdavis.edu/~hardaker In-Reply-To: Per Abrahamsen's message of 06 Dec 1996 09:44:09 +0100 Original-Lines: 26 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.73/XEmacs 19.14 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9116 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9116 >>>>> "Lars" == Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: Lars> You could limit the summaries to articles that don't have the Lars> "E" mark in some summary hook? >>>>> "Per" == Per Abrahamsen writes: Per> I guess the idea was that you did a string-match in Per> gnus-newsgroup-name inside the hook function, instead of playing Per> with the group parameters. Bzzz.... Ack... Bad... Noo... That defeats the purpose of the group params! I think it should be modified in the group param buffer. That way, you can add other hooks as well on a group dependent basis. Its also not inheriantly clear when a user enters the group params buffer that it has this special case as well. I think thats one of the nicest aspects of it. (actually, it would be really cool if the comments at the top of the buffer also showed the topic params you're inheriting as well!) Am I making any sense? I really shouldn't read news after drinking my 10:15 coffee... Wes