From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/7574
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Wesley.Hardaker@sphys.unil.ch
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Picon related bugs--anyone else see these?
Date: 13 Aug 1996 14:38:36 +0200
Sender: whardake@iptsun2.unil.ch
Message-ID: <qk2wwz34fxv.fsf@iptsun2.unil.ch>
References: <m220hefsnq.fsf_-_@atreides.erehwon.org> <qk2d90xjf0y.fsf@sphys.unil.ch> <m2ohkgks4c.fsf@atreides.erehwon.org> <tjhgq7hcrd.fsf@sfs.nphil.uni-tuebingen.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035147868 7680 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:04:28 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:04:28 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Sudish Joseph <sudish@mindspring.com>, ding@ifi.uio.no
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id GAA14765 for <steve@miranova.com>; Tue, 13 Aug 1996 06:22:34 -0700
Original-Received: from uldns1.unil.ch (uldns1.unil.ch [130.223.8.20]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <OAA07617@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Tue, 13 Aug 1996 14:40:21 +0200
Original-Received: from iptsun2.unil.ch (actually iptsun2) by uldns1 with SMTP (PP);
          Tue, 13 Aug 1996 14:39:35 +0200
Original-Received: by iptsun2.unil.ch (5.x/Unil-3.1/) id AA25491;
          Tue, 13 Aug 1996 14:38:37 +0200
Original-To: John Griffith <griffith@sfs.nphil.uni-tuebingen.de>
In-Reply-To: John Griffith's message of 13 Aug 1996 11:08:54 +0200
Original-Lines: 16
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.11/XEmacs 19.14
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:7574
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:7574

John Griffith <griffith@sfs.nphil.uni-tuebingen.de> writes:

> I also notice the picon display is slow.  When selecting an article,
> the buffers get messed up for about half a second before stabilizing.
> It could be because of searching for picon files across NFS, or it
> could just be slow drawing on XEmacs' part.

Well, XEmacs isn't really much of a picture editor, so its not on its
high speed priority list.  However, yes, loading it over NFS will
definately make it worse.  Also, elisp is not really the best language
for speed either, so you'll loose some there as well.  However, there
is not much that can be done to speed things up, so I'm afraid you're
stuck for now...

Wes