From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/3811 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dave Disser Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: gnus-topic open-topic indicator Date: 01 Nov 1995 22:35:52 -0800 Organization: Hewlett-Packard Company, San Diego Site Sender: disser@hpsdlgf8.sdd.hp.com Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035144641 27372 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:10:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:10:41 +0000 (UTC) X-From-Line: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Wed Nov 1 23:53:10 1995 Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by miranova.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id XAA06074 for ; Wed, 1 Nov 1995 23:53:03 -0800 Original-Received: from hpsdlo.sdd.hp.com (hpsdlo.sdd.hp.com [15.255.160.64]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Thu, 2 Nov 1995 07:36:01 +0100 Original-Received: from hpsdlgf8.sdd.hp.com by hpsdlo.sdd.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.16/15.5+IOS 3.21+sdd) id AA154854158; Wed, 1 Nov 1995 22:35:59 -0800 Original-Received: by hpsdlgf8.sdd.hp.com (1.37.109.16/15.5+IOS 3.21+sdd) id AA274574158; Wed, 1 Nov 1995 22:35:58 -0800 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no X-Favorite-Condiment: ketchup In-Reply-To: larsi@ifi.uio.no's message of 01 Nov 1995 19:40:39 -0800 Original-Lines: 21 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:3811 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:3811 > > > What about mimicking Emacs' selective display feature and use a trailing " > > > ..." for closed topics? That would have a similar look and feel like > > > various other folding modes (outline-mode, Hyperbole's kotl-mode, > > > hs-minor-mode). > > > > > > Related question: would it make sense to (re)use selective display or an > > > existing folding mode? > > > > That's a departure from the code that's already there, which is > > is more consistent with the way summary buffers have always been > > generated. > > Uhm... this is for the group buffer, not the summary buffers, right? > In which case adding "..." for "folded" topics sounds very Emacsy, > which makes it The Right Thing To Do, I think. Oops, I answered the second question instead of the first. I agree the ... is more Emacsy. --Dave