From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/74908 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Riley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: bogus group Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 00:08:27 +0100 Organization: aich tea tea pea dicky riley dot net Message-ID: References: <87wrnivqgh.fsf@dod.no> <2fbp4uj2qb.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> <4hipz135vr.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> <87bp4tzgdp.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> <2hbp4tqpfu.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> <8739q5z4fe.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> <87y67xxlpe.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> <871v5om0yb.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> <2h8vzv6hzx.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1292108929 28325 80.91.229.12 (11 Dec 2010 23:08:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 23:08:49 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M23264@lists.math.uh.edu Sun Dec 12 00:08:45 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PRYYW-00051L-FA for ding-account@gmane.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 00:08:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PRYYO-0004uK-UP; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:08:36 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PRYYM-0004u3-Um for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:08:34 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PRYYJ-0007Ip-Mt for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:08:32 -0600 Original-Received: from mail-ey0-f176.google.com ([209.85.215.176]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1PRYYI-0003wN-00 for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 00:08:30 +0100 Original-Received: by eyz10 with SMTP id 10so3090713eyz.7 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 15:08:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:organization :references:date:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KIGqzww5KIcVPXKzjQTVmMKSxlnuKDZ+D9ZvVGQSanc=; b=eC2bsc7/zyiH7bM2GP9Cj0V8+WahMmnKEr/IDv/kY1sxBW0Ni5rgm75lqsYZWSWqzN tlG8XoyWY+mZ5U7F+T67wVdhDvhOFtUmfbILG/2XWjgAsm5FMlDFxhIrritKoCAxT8Ne 8MLJmevK7aIbbpZVKDN/OTveJYAzX7/h6oHhs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:organization:references:date:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=rh8lRwgnQLHXQmtfUpQaAjjLGRui8HM0O78D8+nPTASL4LeB1VJ5OiUUo4yE7icVv1 WrlsARUIKjZxj70Apmm1dRPeKqJVBFKy+KjR7hlakrMiDvpsq+A2tdOP6ki8gMTQsoX7 Br/HT5CJlT8uMUtkFsbY1hyBjD2kH0NaTP9no= Original-Received: by 10.213.13.130 with SMTP id c2mr956731eba.5.1292108910414; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 15:08:30 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost ([85.183.18.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b52sm3667602eei.19.2010.12.11.15.08.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 11 Dec 2010 15:08:29 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:74908 Archived-At: Richard Riley writes: > asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sj=C3=B8gren) writes: > >> On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:17:53 +0100, Richard wrote: >> >>> I tried this and I still get all incoming system mail into "bogus". >> >>> (setq nnmail-split-fancy '(|(: spam-split) "inbox")) >>> (setq nnmail-split-methods 'nnmail-split-fancy) >> >> Did using the imap-specific variant of the variables make any >> difference? >> >> Best regards, >> >> Adam > > This is to do with nnml - nothing to do with imap. > > Or am I missing something? > > Just to reiterate: > > this is only about my "local system mail". It has me totally and utterly > confused. > > Any mail to root@local host I have aliased to rgr@localhost. This ends > up in ~/Mail. > > The default nnml back end seems to know about this. I dont know how or > why but my select method is simply:- > > (setq gnus-select-method '(nnml "nnml")) > > I sent root a mail and it ended up in Gnus-Spam on nnml backend. > > I then reverted to > > (setq nnmail-split-fancy '("inbox") ; I suspect this is wrong for a start. > > and it ended up in bogus again. > > As I said, I'm a bit blind to it all now and cant see the wood for the > trees is anymore as I dont understand how nnmail vars and nnml are > related. Anyone? > Just to reply to myself, the docs say the nnmail-split-methods should be a list of lists. ,---- | The `nnmail-split-methods' variable says how the incoming mail is to be | split into groups. |=20 | (setq nnmail-split-methods | '(("mail.junk" "^From:.*Lars Ingebrigtsen") | ("mail.crazy" "^Subject:.*die\\|^Organization:.*flabby") | ("mail.other" ""))) |=20 | This variable is a list of lists, where the first element of each of | these lists is the name of the mail group (they do not have to be called | something beginning with `mail', by the way), and the second element is | a regular expression used on the header of each mail to determine if it | belongs in this mail group. `---- So I tried:- (setq nnmail-split-methods '(("inbox" ""))) The new mail still goes to bogus. Suggestions?