From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8174 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael R Cook Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: gnus-slave Date: 03 Oct 1996 11:30:30 -0400 Sender: mcook@cognex.com Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148378 10520 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:12:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:12:58 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.6/8.6.9) with SMTP id IAA25378 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 1996 08:58:46 -0700 Original-Received: from cognex-bh.cognex.com (cognex-bh.cognex.com [198.232.30.66]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Thu, 3 Oct 1996 17:31:08 +0200 Original-Received: (from uucp@localhost) by cognex-bh.cognex.com (8.6.12/8.6.11) id LAA17577 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 1996 11:33:28 -0400 Original-Received: from cognex-gw.cognex.com by cognex-bh.cognex.com via smap (V1.3) id sma017567; Thu Oct 3 11:32:59 1996 Original-Received: from erawan.cognex.com (erawan.cognex.com [128.1.5.47]) by cognex.cognex.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA23128 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 1996 11:30:35 -0400 Original-Received: by erawan.cognex.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id LAA12053; Thu, 3 Oct 1996 11:30:32 -0400 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 02 Oct 1996 01:02:20 +0100 Original-Lines: 11 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.46/Emacs 19.34 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8174 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8174 Shouldn't `gnus-slave' read any existing slave files? If I start `gnus-slave', read a few articles, and exit gnus, if I then start `gnus-slave' again, the articles I read are presented to me again as being unread. I would think starting up `M-x gnus-slave' should happen exactly as `M-x gnus' does, except that `gnus-slave' would not delete the slave files. No? Michael.