From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/10009 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Franklin Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: POP3 and SMTP... Date: 28 Feb 1997 12:27:28 -0800 Sender: paul@cs.washington.edu Message-ID: References: <8025644C.00472D0D.00@mail.atl.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149947 21825 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:39:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:39:07 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA05598 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 12:40:27 -0800 Original-Received: from june.cs.washington.edu (june.cs.washington.edu [128.95.1.4]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 21:27:37 +0100 Original-Received: from fester.cs.washington.edu (fester.cs.washington.edu [128.95.4.119]) by june.cs.washington.edu (8.8.5+CS/7.2ju) with ESMTP id MAA02672; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 12:27:34 -0800 Original-Received: (from paul@localhost) by fester.cs.washington.edu (8.6.12/8.6.9) id MAA08233; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 12:27:33 -0800 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: Donald Hunter's message of Fri, 28 Feb 1997 12:53:48 +0100 Original-Lines: 19 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.10/Emacs 19.34 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10009 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10009 >>>>> Donald Hunter writes: > I've got a hack similar to Rich Pieri's nnmail-pop3-movemail to > get pop3-movemail working with nnmail. The problem is that my > spool is set up like this: > (setq nnmail-spool-file > '("/var/mail/dhunter" "po:atlserver")) > Nnmail tries to use pop3-movemail to do the standard mail as > well, of course. My cursory glance at the code suggests that a > fair bit of nnmail.el would have to be rewritten to support > different movemails for different spools. Could this go on the > requested feature list ? If Lars doesn't do this, I'm sure someone else (maybe me) will; I sketched one idea for doing this a while back which basically creates mail spool backends, and I'm not the only one to mutter about doing similar changes in the next development cycle. --Paul