From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/11628 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Franklin Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Hmm.. 2 q's Date: 14 Jul 1997 14:01:37 -0700 Sender: paul@cs.washington.edu Message-ID: References: <199707141819.LAA13825@knife.statsci.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035151307 31509 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:01:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:01:47 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id PAA11562 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 1997 15:05:11 -0700 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA08210 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 1997 17:01:53 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Mon, 14 Jul 1997 23:01:56 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 1219 invoked by uid 504); 14 Jul 1997 21:01:48 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 1216 invoked from network); 14 Jul 1997 21:01:47 -0000 Original-Received: from june.cs.washington.edu (128.95.1.4) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 14 Jul 1997 21:01:47 -0000 Original-Received: from maryanne.cs.washington.edu (maryanne.cs.washington.edu [128.95.4.76]) by june.cs.washington.edu (8.8.5+CS/7.2ju) with ESMTP id OAA17644; Mon, 14 Jul 1997 14:01:40 -0700 Original-Received: (from paul@localhost) by maryanne.cs.washington.edu (8.6.12/8.6.9) id OAA24207; Mon, 14 Jul 1997 14:01:39 -0700 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Scott Blachowicz's message of Mon, 14 Jul 1997 11:19:13 -0700 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.39/Emacs 19.34 Original-Lines: 22 Original-Xref: altair.xemacs.org dgnus-list:2018 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:11628 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:11628 >>>>> Scott Blachowicz writes: > Are there requirements on the message-id as far as legal characters & > such? (e.g. maybe there should be precisely one @ character?) I've been > doing some filtering on message-id's in my mailagent rules: > 1) no @ between the <...>. > 5) no < > 6) no > I get headers like the following from a X.400-SMTP gateway: In-Reply-To: r9qbu4bo1rd.fsf(a)maryanne.cs.washington.edu Message-ID: I have no idea how they could guarantee that that message id is unique. Sigh, --Paul