From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/10277 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Franklin Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Should archive server add Message-IDs to the cache? Date: 18 Mar 1997 13:19:41 -0800 Sender: paul@cs.washington.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035150175 23468 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:42:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:42:55 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA18710 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 1997 13:28:33 -0800 Original-Received: from teapotdome.cs.washington.edu (teapotdome.cs.washington.edu [128.95.1.55]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Tue, 18 Mar 1997 22:17:47 +0100 Original-Received: (paul@localhost) by teapotdome.cs.washington.edu (8.6.12/7.2ws+) id NAA19486; Tue, 18 Mar 1997 13:19:43 -0800 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: Kai Grossjohann's message of 18 Mar 1997 19:02:54 +0100 Original-Lines: 15 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.25/Emacs 19.34 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10277 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10277 >>>>> Kai Grossjohann writes: > So there seems to be a conflict. Some people use archive groups, like > you, and would like one behavior. Other people don't use archive > groups (like me) and would like the other behavior. > But I guess this could be made an option, couldn't it? I'd like to see this made an option as well. Right now, I always bcc: myself to make sure my outgoing and incoming mail gets merged (which is almost the same as what Kai wants). I've just never been brave enough to convert over to using gcc:, and having this option become "official" would probably motivate me to make that transition. --Paul