From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/10001
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Paul Franklin <paul@cs.washington.edu>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Hmm.. pop in gnus?
Date: 26 Feb 1997 12:33:42 -0800
Sender: paul@cs.washington.edu
Message-ID: <r9qsp2je28p.fsf@fester.cs.washington.edu>
References: <y8swwrwexgu.fsf@zarf-mouse.student.imsa.edu> <r9qhgj0pie6.fsf@fester.cs.washington.edu> <w47mjvboh8.fsf@loiosh.kei.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149940 21765 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:39:00 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:39:00 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: John Twilley <jmt@NDA.COM>
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from riker.diamond-lane.net (root@riker [206.190.83.4])
	by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA00126
	for <steve@miranova.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 12:51:58 -0800
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
	by riker.diamond-lane.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA10033
	for <steve@miranova.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 12:59:28 -0800
Original-Received: from june.cs.washington.edu (june.cs.washington.edu [128.95.1.4]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <VAA11483@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 21:33:51 +0100
Original-Received: from fester.cs.washington.edu (fester.cs.washington.edu [128.95.4.119]) by june.cs.washington.edu (8.8.5+CS/7.2ju) with ESMTP id MAA28494; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 12:33:46 -0800
Original-Received: (from paul@localhost) by fester.cs.washington.edu (8.6.12/8.6.9) id MAA06272; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 12:33:45 -0800
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: Christopher Davis's message of 26 Feb 1997 10:01:39 -0500
Original-Lines: 16
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.10/Emacs 19.34
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10001
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10001

>>>>> Christopher Davis writes:

 > PF> == Paul Franklin <paul@cs.washington.edu>

 >  PF> APOP is non-trivial though since the APOP code disappeared from the
 >  PF> FSF distribution about Emacs 19.29, and even if you resurrect the
 >  PF> required code, it needs to be installed setuid root.

 > I think you're confusing APOP (which uses a challenge-response
 > authentication) with RPOP (which used the rsh/rlogin approach).

Oops.  You're quite right.

Sorry for any confusion and false hopes I might have given folks.

--Paul