From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/73985
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Riley <rileyrg@googlemail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Improving Gnus speed
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 23:45:57 +0100
Organization: aich tea tea pea dicky riley dot net
Message-ID: <rb39ra9kuy.fsf@news.eternal-september.org>
References: <m2tyjqvfng.fsf@gmail.com> <m3lj52xr6s.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org>
	<m2iq06s1zs.fsf@gmail.com> <m21v6ui508.fsf@igel.home>
	<87d3qeqi9z.fsf@lifelogs.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1289342783 16619 80.91.229.12 (9 Nov 2010 22:46:23 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 22:46:23 +0000 (UTC)
To: ding@gnus.org
Original-X-From: ding-owner+M22353@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Nov 09 23:46:19 2010
Return-path: <ding-owner+M22353@lists.math.uh.edu>
Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org
Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <ding-owner+M22353@lists.math.uh.edu>)
	id 1PFwxE-00034V-Nh
	for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 23:46:17 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu)
	by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <ding-owner+M22353@lists.math.uh.edu>)
	id 1PFwx6-0006d1-FS; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 16:46:08 -0600
Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33])
	by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <postmaster@quimby.gnus.org>)
	id 1PFwx4-0006cl-Oc
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 16:46:06 -0600
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51])
	by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <postmaster@quimby.gnus.org>)
	id 1PFwx0-0004tp-Gp
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 16:46:06 -0600
Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com ([209.85.214.44])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1PFwwz-0006zO-00
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 23:46:01 +0100
Original-Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so9103bwz.17
        for <ding@gnus.org>; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 14:46:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:organization
         :references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version
         :content-type;
        bh=Sajc2mhSnvndYcLb03pMomMiH4OHronOqU/9AijuYI4=;
        b=juHTLfqwSYut+RnHvN+Z2FdvGmDrdTb5GyPcH+UJoFRDYanY9thWlwHDYOyBRHpGMv
         R8dEJoHArFla5Mz/8M/wb20kP36mcvT4WgJo5XuIrGgey8lOkZXjqb9iJOihESz7ct8c
         DqFn5HXQVXct1lh0YdiCPVpO6W7dBPH1S08Vc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=from:to:subject:organization:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id
         :user-agent:mime-version:content-type;
        b=iUE1RrhqkOi2SgbYNETcdBnJ8xxiVih8mJZYSL2L0XB1ZYiLyIFK8p7IXf9cWk7azu
         44JZgxebszd4xs2y6yp4F7ImRaXE+uaE4tbRgiOlOW+67RsLJrVnmc+gD7OYWR2L5x86
         yqSyk/NkZaV+ubEo7OHI+F8unn7UA+cjiGxjo=
Original-Received: by 10.204.54.82 with SMTP id p18mr1270931bkg.205.1289342760353;
        Tue, 09 Nov 2010 14:46:00 -0800 (PST)
Original-Received: from localhost ([85.183.18.158])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l3sm431654fan.2.2010.11.09.14.45.58
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Tue, 09 Nov 2010 14:45:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <87d3qeqi9z.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Tue, 09
	Nov 2010 15:49:44 -0600")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--)
List-ID: <ding.gnus.org>
Precedence: bulk
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:73985
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/73985>

Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:

> On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 22:03:35 +0100 Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> wrote: 
>
> AS> Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com> writes:
>>> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
>>>> The Gnus sources are so small that just using HTTP seems OK to me,
>>>> speedwise.
>>> 
>>> Well even in that case, why not using the native protocol which is more
>>> efficient, stable ... ?
>
> AS> It _is_ using the native protocol, over HTTP.
>
> Yeah.  I set it up to use the smart server or something :)
>
> Also, many corporate firewalls including mine don't allow the git
> protocol.  So HTTP is a better transport than native in order to serve
> the most people.
>
> Ted
>

Well, most of those that are limited by a firewall yes. Most people use
the git protocol. Which begs the question : can both not be enabled? The
transport protocol shouldn't affect the repo in any shape nor form
should it?