From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/10842 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Graham Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: gnus date suggestion Date: 02 May 1997 00:53:47 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035150646 26735 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:50:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:50:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "\(ding\) Gnus Mailing List" , XEmacs Beta Discussion List Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA10991 for ; Thu, 1 May 1997 22:27:29 -0700 Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Fri, 2 May 1997 06:53:54 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 17971 invoked by uid 504); 2 May 1997 04:51:38 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 17968 invoked from network); 2 May 1997 04:51:38 -0000 Original-Received: from urth.acsu.buffalo.edu (qmailr@128.205.7.9) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 2 May 1997 04:51:38 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 11608 invoked by uid 305); 2 May 1997 04:53:47 -0000 Original-To: jason@mastaler.com (Jason R. Mastaler) In-Reply-To: jason@mastaler.com's message of 01 May 1997 10:21:27 -0400 Original-Lines: 17 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.48/Emacs 19.34 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10842 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10842 since both of the are legal (by my reading of rfcs 822 and 1123) i don't understand the objection to the gnus format. jason> I still think the Gnus "Date:" header format is non-standard. I jason> also noticed VM 6.29 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid doesn't have this jason> limitation. jason> Gnus = Date: 01 May 1997 09:40:20 -0400 jason> VM = Date: Thu, 1 May 1997 09:53:01 -0400 (EDT) -- paul pjg@acsu.Buffalo.EDU |public keys at: | http://urth.acsu.Buffalo.EDU/~pjg/key.html if the above contains opinions they are mine unless marked otherwise.