From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6905 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Per Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gnus v5.2.24 is released Date: 24 Jun 1996 09:04:25 +0200 Sender: abraham@dina.kvl.dk Message-ID: References: <199606222128.QAA02474@grendel.austin.texas.net> <199606232214.RAA00572@grendel.austin.texas.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035147295 5209 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:54:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:54:55 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id BAA29901 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 01:10:27 -0700 Original-Received: from elc1.dina.kvl.dk (elc1.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.228]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 09:05:25 +0200 Original-Received: from kleene.dina.kvl.dk (kleene.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.223]) by elc1.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) with ESMTP id JAA23729; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 09:03:53 +0200 Original-Received: (abraham@localhost) by kleene.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) id JAA05547; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 09:04:26 +0200 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no X-Face: +kRV2]2q}lixHkE{U)mY#+6]{AH=yN~S9@IFiOa@X6?GM|8MBp/ In-Reply-To: Firebeard's message of Sun, 23 Jun 1996 17:14:48 -0500 Original-Lines: 9 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.2.22/Emacs 19.31 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6905 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6905 >>>>> "F" == Firebeard writes: F> Then why is Gnus (apparently) not using the X- convention? I F> certainly don't want Gnus handling the header one way, and then have F> the Mail-Copies-To header defined to be addresses to CC on replies. There are no guarantee that an X header won't mean something else in another newsreader either. On the other hand, it would be nice if `Mail-Copies-To' became official.