From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6126 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Per Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Suggestions Date: 04 May 1996 04:02:28 +0200 Sender: abraham@dina.kvl.dk Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146628 2648 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:43:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:43:48 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id TAA02708 for ; Fri, 3 May 1996 19:39:14 -0700 Original-Received: from elc1.dina.kvl.dk (elc1.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.228]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Sat, 4 May 1996 04:08:52 +0200 Original-Received: from babbage.dina.kvl.dk (babbage.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.217]) by elc1.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) with ESMTP id EAA18350; Sat, 4 May 1996 04:00:47 +0200 Original-Received: (abraham@localhost) by babbage.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) id EAA21893; Sat, 4 May 1996 04:02:28 +0200 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no X-Face: +kRV2]2q}lixHkE{U)mY#+6]{AH=yN~S9@IFiOa@X6?GM|8MBp/ In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 03 May 1996 12:35:03 -0700 Original-Lines: 19 X-Mailer: September Gnus v0.80/Emacs 19.30 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6126 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6126 >>>>> "Ketil" == Ketil Z Malde writes: _K_e_t_i_l_> Perhaps what we really need is for some well chosen SGML tags _K_e_t_i_l_> to get accepted on Usenet. How about an SGML-hierarchy? RFD _K_e_t_i_l_> sgml.general, anyone? Have tags like , , , _K_e_t_i_l_> , for instance. >>>>> "SLB" == Steven L Baur writes: SLB> Already implemented, as this message should indicate (if I haven't SLB> ssccrreewweedd uupp). The magic word is _r_i_c_h_t_e_x_t. Actually, it is _t_e_x_t_/_e_n_r_i_c_h_e_d. Too many people confused richtext with some half-hearted and poorly defined attempt at a portable word processor format created by Microsoft with a similar name. But I think it worked, at least metamail (_M_-_t) could decode the message.