From: abraham@dina.kvl.dk (Per Abrahamsen)
Subject: Re: Yanking the original article buffer
Date: 07 Mar 1996 02:11:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <rj20n5wvu3.fsf@ssv4.dina.kvl.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: dhall@illusion.apk.net's message of 06 Mar 1996 19:36:09 -0500
>>>>> "dh" == d hall <dhall@illusion.apk.net> writes:
dh> Per mentioned an invisible buffer which contains the original article.
dh> Could Sept. Gnus. I'm assuming SC doesn't know about this buffer and yanks
dh> the modified buffer. Could/should Emacs overload this function with it's
dh> own version? Or else should Emacs switch to the original article buffer
dh> before it decides to reply/followup?
I'd prefer SuperCite to use the buffer where I have unread the
quotable, I mean unquoted the printable characters.
prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-03-07 1:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-03-07 0:36 d. hall
1996-03-07 1:11 ` Per Abrahamsen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=rj20n5wvu3.fsf@ssv4.dina.kvl.dk \
--to=abraham@dina.kvl.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).