From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/7768
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Different "Re:" Styles
Date: 30 Aug 1996 11:43:32 +0200
Organization: The Church of Emacs
Sender: abraham@dina.kvl.dk
Message-ID: <rj3f15gqbf.fsf@kolmogorov.dina.kvl.dk>
References: <x2vie1u6d7.fsf@lemming0.lem.uni-karlsruhe.de>
	<w8s7mqh9216.fsf@hrym.ifi.uio.no>
	<s5kvie1fil7.fsf@hp138.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148036 8472 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:07:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:07:16 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id IAA07986 for <steve@miranova.com>; Fri, 30 Aug 1996 08:33:18 -0700
Original-Received: from elc1.dina.kvl.dk (elc1.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.228]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <LAA21425@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Fri, 30 Aug 1996 11:43:23 +0200
Original-Received: from kolmogorov.dina.kvl.dk (kolmogorov.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.209]) by elc1.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) with ESMTP id LAA13546; Fri, 30 Aug 1996 11:39:17 +0200
Original-Received: (abraham@localhost) by kolmogorov.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) id LAA17604; Fri, 30 Aug 1996 11:43:32 +0200
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
X-Face: +kRV2]2q}lixHkE{U)mY#+6]{AH=yN~S9@IFiOa@X6?GM<U{B+4e{k79.Ya{~':DblFPCg$
 @60,BfLv2@SKZ19cMWK0/C'v;tM:|6B'R}U1rp6CL&kN({9<zF/V{:JCg27yC)9oZjeqcQawzKfiNL
 t9}`vjmK["dRQC/qGFQq"%u|Q`:6{"Rz}b(dnl_"3$Jtqimi>|8MBp/
In-Reply-To: Jost Krieger's message of 30 Aug 1996 09:15:48 +0200
Original-Lines: 10
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.33
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:7768
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:7768


The Seal of Good Netkeeping seems to allow rewrites that compensate
for broken software like Microsoft Exchange:

The Good Net-Keeping Seal of Approval says:

> Exception: The software MAY try to compensate for other people's
> broken software by stripping off such non-standard prefixes as
> "Re(2): ", "Re:" (no space), "RE: ", "re: ", or "Re: Re: " and
> replacing them with "Re: ".