From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8512
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: What is better for splitting: complex regexp or many rules
Date: 29 Oct 1996 10:35:42 +0100
Organization: The Church of Emacs
Sender: abraham@dina.kvl.dk
Message-ID: <rj4tje864x.fsf@kolmogorov.dina.kvl.dk>
References: <ngramo97qq.fsf@tasking.nl> <yj93eyyfxyz.fsf@adobe.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148660 12525 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:17:40 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:17:40 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: (qmail 15490 invoked from smtpd); 29 Oct 1996 10:21:19 -0000
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2)
  by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 29 Oct 1996 10:21:18 -0000
Original-Received: from elc1.dina.kvl.dk (elc1.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.228]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <KAA03666@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Tue, 29 Oct 1996 10:35:59 +0100
Original-Received: from kolmogorov.dina.kvl.dk (kolmogorov.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.209]) by elc1.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) with ESMTP id KAA19937; Tue, 29 Oct 1996 10:29:28 +0100
Original-Received: (abraham@localhost) by kolmogorov.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) id KAA15906; Tue, 29 Oct 1996 10:35:42 +0100
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
X-Face: +kRV2]2q}lixHkE{U)mY#+6]{AH=yN~S9@IFiOa@X6?GM<U{B+4e{k79.Ya{~':DblFPCg$
 @60,BfLv2@SKZ19cMWK0/C'v;tM:|6B'R}U1rp6CL&kN({9<zF/V{:JCg27yC)9oZjeqcQawzKfiNL
 t9}`vjmK["dRQC/qGFQq"%u|Q`:6{"Rz}b(dnl_"3$Jtqimi>|8MBp/
In-Reply-To: Danny Siu's message of 28 Oct 1996 15:52:36 -0800
Original-Lines: 7
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.52/Emacs 19.34
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8512
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8512


Danny Siu <dsiu@Adobe.COM> writes:

> Anyone lisp expert knows the performace trade off btw two cases?

Both cases are unlikely to be significant compared to the time used
for disk I/O when splitting mail.