From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/34842
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Mail-Followup-To interaction with gnus-summary-followup
Date: 18 Feb 2001 16:38:26 +0100
Organization: The Church of Emacs
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <rj66i8q9vx.fsf@ssv2.dina.kvl.dk>
References: <87y9vdwabb.fsf@sto-kerrig.org>
	<m38zndc8m8.fsf@multivac.student.cwru.edu>
	<873ddeiezv.fsf@sto-kerrig.org>
	<m366i96obq.fsf@multivac.student.cwru.edu>
	<2n66i99g4u.fsf@tiger.jia.vnet> <878zn4u85f.fsf@sto-kerrig.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035170690 32365 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:24:50 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:24:50 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52587D049E
	for <jason@mastaler.com>; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 10:39:19 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAC25313;
	Sun, 18 Feb 2001 09:39:13 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 18 Feb 2001 09:38:30 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged))
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA03565
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 09:38:19 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from sheridan.dina.kvl.dk (sheridan.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.227])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24375D049E
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 10:38:32 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: from ssv2.dina.kvl.dk (ssv2.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.226])
	by sheridan.dina.kvl.dk (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id QAA07198;
	Sun, 18 Feb 2001 16:38:26 +0100
Original-Received: from abraham by ssv2.dina.kvl.dk with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 14UVus-0003ne-00; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 16:38:26 +0100
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
X-Face: +kRV2]2q}lixHkE{U)mY#+6]{AH=yN~S9@IFiOa@X6?GM<U{B+4e{k79.Ya{~':DblFPCg$
 @60,BfLv2@SKZ19cMWK0/C'v;tM:|6B'R}U1rp6CL&kN({9<zF/V{:JCg27yC)9oZjeqcQawzKfiNL
 t9}`vjmK["dRQC/qGFQq"%u|Q`:6{"Rz}b(dnl_"3$Jtqimi>|8MBp/
In-Reply-To: <878zn4u85f.fsf@sto-kerrig.org> (Paul J Collins's message of "18 Feb 2001 00:50:10 +0000")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) Emacs/20.7
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Original-Lines: 17
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:34842
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:34842

Paul J Collins <sneakums@sto-kerrig.org> writes:

> Okay, just to be perfectly clear (and perhaps slightly anal); if I
> want `f' to go to the list, I need to set to-address; 

Yep.

> if I want `a' to
> go to the list, I need to set to-list.

Or to-address, either one will work.

> Are there any subtleties that will screw up a strategy where I set
> both to-address and to-list to the address of the list?

It should be unnecessary, to-address alone will (or should) do the
trick.