From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/32955
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Mail-{Followup,Reply}-To
Date: 24 Oct 2000 14:45:04 +0200
Organization: The Church of Emacs
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <rj66miv25r.fsf@ssv2.dina.kvl.dk>
References: <m37l6zcm7w.fsf@multivac.student.cwru.edu>
	<vafk8ay5zy1.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035169151 22661 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:59:11 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:59:11 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from spinoza.math.uh.edu (spinoza.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.18])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B641AD051F
	for <jason@mastaler.com>; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 08:31:51 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by spinoza.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAB23688;
	Tue, 24 Oct 2000 07:31:28 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 24 Oct 2000 07:30:48 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged))
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA23757
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 07:30:35 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from sheridan.dina.kvl.dk (sheridan.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.227])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FD54D051F
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 08:30:52 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from ssv2.dina.kvl.dk (ssv2.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.226])
	by sheridan.dina.kvl.dk (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id OAA14442;
	Tue, 24 Oct 2000 14:30:50 +0200
Original-Received: from abraham by ssv2.dina.kvl.dk with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 13o3Rw-00029W-00; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 14:45:04 +0200
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
X-Face: +kRV2]2q}lixHkE{U)mY#+6]{AH=yN~S9@IFiOa@X6?GM<U{B+4e{k79.Ya{~':DblFPCg$
 @60,BfLv2@SKZ19cMWK0/C'v;tM:|6B'R}U1rp6CL&kN({9<zF/V{:JCg27yC)9oZjeqcQawzKfiNL
 t9}`vjmK["dRQC/qGFQq"%u|Q`:6{"Rz}b(dnl_"3$Jtqimi>|8MBp/
In-Reply-To: <vafk8ay5zy1.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
Original-Lines: 13
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32955
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32955

Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Gro=DFjohann) writes:

> AFAICS, the code does not know about Mail-Followup-To.

Should it?=20=20

I don't think it would be hard to teach message.el to obey the two
headers.  It could also generate the two headers based on group
parameters.  If "broken-reply-to" is set, generate "mail-reply-to".
If "to-list" or "to-address" is set, generate "mail-followup-to".  The
last should probably be controlled by a separate flag though.

Have we started on an "experiental" Gnus branch yet?