From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/12163 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Per Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Quassia Gnus v0.5 is released Date: 18 Sep 1997 23:42:42 +0200 Organization: The Church of Emacs Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035151748 2254 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:09:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:09:08 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA23668 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 1997 15:34:59 -0700 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA12926 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 1997 17:31:17 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Thu, 18 Sep 1997 23:42:49 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 28484 invoked by uid 504); 18 Sep 1997 21:42:47 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 28481 invoked from network); 18 Sep 1997 21:42:47 -0000 Original-Received: from elc1.dina.kvl.dk (130.225.40.228) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 18 Sep 1997 21:42:46 -0000 Original-Received: from zuse.dina.kvl.dk (zuse.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.245]) by elc1.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) with ESMTP id XAA12555; Thu, 18 Sep 1997 23:36:52 +0200 Original-Received: (abraham@localhost) by zuse.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) id XAA22471; Thu, 18 Sep 1997 23:42:42 +0200 Original-To: "(ding)" X-Face: +kRV2]2q}lixHkE{U)mY#+6]{AH=yN~S9@IFiOa@X6?GM|8MBp/ In-Reply-To: Stainless Steel Rat's message of "18 Sep 1997 15:35:25 -0400" Original-Lines: 13 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.64/Emacs 19.34 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:12163 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:12163 Stainless Steel Rat writes: > I dislike that on a number of levels, not the least of which is that it > adds an (IMO) unnecessary mark. And the alternative adds an (FMV) unnecessary and problematic group. > Besides, a separate queue folder stands > out clearly as such. Which would be good the way you intend to use it, and bad the way I intent to use it.