From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6205
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Rewriting the subject (Was: [sgnus v0.83] Followup Subject: typos in message.el (patch))
Date: 14 May 1996 17:25:07 +0200
Sender: abraham@dina.kvl.dk
Message-ID: <rj7muf9t0s.fsf@babbage.dina.kvl.dk>
References: <m2wx2laesk.fsf@deanna.miranova.com> <x6k9yly0dx.fsf@eyesore.no>
	<d991f12t6c.fsf@ashoka.cs.umn.edu>
	<m24tpp9pf8.fsf@deanna.miranova.com> <x6u3xovydp.fsf@eyesore.no>
	<ufa4tpjhnob.fsf_-_@sina.hpc.uh.edu>
	<rjafzba1c8.fsf@babbage.dina.kvl.dk>
	<x7spd35nqo.fsf@unilab.dfci.harvard.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146694 2855 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:44:54 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:44:54 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id JAA07238 for <steve@miranova.com>; Tue, 14 May 1996 09:21:08 -0700
Original-Received: from elc1.dina.kvl.dk (elc1.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.228]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <RAA28541@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Tue, 14 May 1996 17:31:58 +0200
Original-Received: from babbage.dina.kvl.dk (babbage.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.217]) by elc1.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) with ESMTP id RAA03738; Tue, 14 May 1996 17:23:31 +0200
Original-Received: (abraham@localhost) by babbage.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) id RAA07264; Tue, 14 May 1996 17:25:07 +0200
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
X-Face: +kRV2]2q}lixHkE{U)mY#+6]{AH=yN~S9@IFiOa@X6?GM<U{B+4e{k79.Ya{~':DblFPCg$
 @60,BfLv2@SKZ19cMWK0/C'v;tM:|6B'R}U1rp6CL&kN({9<zF/V{:JCg27yC)9oZjeqcQawzKfiNL
 t9}`vjmK["dRQC/qGFQq"%u|Q`:6{"Rz}b(dnl_"3$Jtqimi>|8MBp/
In-Reply-To: Richard Pieri's message of 14 May 1996 10:32:47 -0400
Original-Lines: 22
X-Mailer: September Gnus v0.84/Emacs 19.30
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6205
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6205


>>>>> "JLT" == Jason L Tibbitts <tibbs@hpc.uh.edu> writes:

JLT> The subject line is for humans.

>>>>> "PA" == Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk> writes:

PA> This is a pretty good reason for the newsreader to leave it alone. 

>>>>> "RP" == Richard Pieri <ratinox@unilab.dfci.harvard.edu> writes:

RP> Or a pretty good reason to massage it into something that a human can
RP> more easilly parse.

Well, that is what nn tried to do with Re^4: and Lotus try to do with
the "- Reply" string.

I'd say massage the subject as much as you want for presentation
purposes in the article and subject buffers, but when you generate a
reply or followup, make the default subject line be in strict
compliance with The Seal and with Son-of-RFC1036.