From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9200
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Drats!
Date: 13 Dec 1996 08:25:34 +0100
Organization: The Church of Emacs
Sender: abraham@dina.kvl.dk
Message-ID: <rjafri3nyp.fsf@babbage.dina.kvl.dk>
References: <m2via8y0ld.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no> 	<rjwwuo2gxq.fsf@babbage.dina.kvl.dk> <6iv9173vg2o.fsf@erpland.engin.umich.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149261 17038 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:27:41 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:27:41 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
          by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id XAA05470 for <steve@miranova.com>; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 23:50:18 -0800
Original-Received: from elc1.dina.kvl.dk (elc1.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.228]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <IAA07281@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 08:34:18 +0100
Original-Received: from babbage.dina.kvl.dk (babbage.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.217]) by elc1.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) with ESMTP id IAA03008; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 08:26:11 +0100
Original-Received: (abraham@localhost) by babbage.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) id IAA15909; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 08:25:34 +0100
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
X-Face: +kRV2]2q}lixHkE{U)mY#+6]{AH=yN~S9@IFiOa@X6?GM<U{B+4e{k79.Ya{~':DblFPCg$
 @60,BfLv2@SKZ19cMWK0/C'v;tM:|6B'R}U1rp6CL&kN({9<zF/V{:JCg27yC)9oZjeqcQawzKfiNL
 t9}`vjmK["dRQC/qGFQq"%u|Q`:6{"Rz}b(dnl_"3$Jtqimi>|8MBp/
In-Reply-To: Michael Lamoureux's message of 12 Dec 1996 12:16:15 -0500
Original-Lines: 9
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.74/Emacs 19.34
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9200
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9200


Michael Lamoureux <lamour@engin.umich.edu> writes:

> Hmmm, a high rank in the comp.* hierarchy is to be expected, I think.
> The really interesting checks would be on the soc.* and rec.*
> hierarchies to see if Gnus users are well-rounded or not.  ;-)

I did the statistics, and let me summarize them this way: 
If you use Gnus, you apparently don't need other recreations.