From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8010 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Per Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: discouraging use of `Re: none' subject Date: 24 Sep 1996 21:19:33 +0200 Organization: The Church of Emacs Sender: abraham@dina.kvl.dk Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148243 9661 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:10:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:10:43 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.6/8.6.9) with SMTP id MAA01972 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 1996 12:48:44 -0700 Original-Received: from elc1.dina.kvl.dk (elc1.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.228]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Tue, 24 Sep 1996 21:19:34 +0200 Original-Received: from kolmogorov.dina.kvl.dk (kolmogorov.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.209]) by elc1.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) with ESMTP id VAA13584; Tue, 24 Sep 1996 21:14:31 +0200 Original-Received: (abraham@localhost) by kolmogorov.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) id VAA21249; Tue, 24 Sep 1996 21:19:33 +0200 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no X-Face: +kRV2]2q}lixHkE{U)mY#+6]{AH=yN~S9@IFiOa@X6?GM|8MBp/ In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 24 Sep 1996 19:57:15 +0200 Original-Lines: 27 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.40/Emacs 19.34 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8010 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8010 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Hm. I don't know. If you're responding to a message with no subject, > I think a "Re: none" subject is appropriate. Perhaps, but from a purely practical point of view I would appreciate if Gnus would remind me to add a subject. Here is an extract from a folder containing my correspondence with a friend who doesn't believe in subject lines. If I hadn't manually changed the subject lines on the replies, this listing would have been very non-informative. As you see, I forgot to do this in the first reply in the last thread. Having Gnus remind me would be a great help. OA- [ 8: Peter Juhl ] (none) O + [ 8: Per Abrahamsen ] Jim Flemming O [ 11: Peter Juhl ] -||- OA- [ 10: Peter Juhl ] (none) O + [ 17: Per Abrahamsen ] Tegnsæt O [ 11: Peter Juhl ] -||- OA- [ 8: Peter Juhl ] (none) O + [ 7: Per Abrahamsen ] Jul & Nytår OA- [ 7: Peter Juhl ] (none) O + [ 5: Per Abrahamsen ] Re: none OA [ 7: Peter Juhl ] -||- O + [ 4: Per Abrahamsen ] Indent O [ 6: Peter Juhl ] -||-