From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6645
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: miscellaneous Gnus problems/questions
Date: 12 Jun 1996 10:17:32 +0200
Sender: abraham@dina.kvl.dk
Message-ID: <rjd935o2qr.fsf@kleene.dina.kvl.dk>
References: <199606120411.AAA17430@csb.bu.edu>
	<rjhgsho4cl.fsf@kleene.dina.kvl.dk> <199606120751.DAA21754@csb.bu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035147070 4306 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:51:10 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:51:10 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id BAA12783 for <steve@miranova.com>; Wed, 12 Jun 1996 01:46:55 -0700
Original-Received: from elc1.dina.kvl.dk (elc1.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.228]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <KAA10962@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Wed, 12 Jun 1996 10:18:21 +0200
Original-Received: from kleene.dina.kvl.dk (kleene.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.223]) by elc1.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) with ESMTP id KAA06017; Wed, 12 Jun 1996 10:17:13 +0200
Original-Received: (abraham@localhost) by kleene.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) id KAA27257; Wed, 12 Jun 1996 10:17:33 +0200
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
X-Face: +kRV2]2q}lixHkE{U)mY#+6]{AH=yN~S9@IFiOa@X6?GM<U{B+4e{k79.Ya{~':DblFPCg$
 @60,BfLv2@SKZ19cMWK0/C'v;tM:|6B'R}U1rp6CL&kN({9<zF/V{:JCg27yC)9oZjeqcQawzKfiNL
 t9}`vjmK["dRQC/qGFQq"%u|Q`:6{"Rz}b(dnl_"3$Jtqimi>|8MBp/
In-Reply-To: jbw@cs.bu.edu's message of Wed, 12 Jun 1996 03:51:09 -0400
Original-Lines: 13
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.2.15/Emacs 19.31
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6645
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6645

>>>>> "JW" == Joe Wells <jbw@cs.bu.edu> writes:

JW> 15. A bug in nnmail-split it: "\\>\\)" should be "\\)\\>".

>>>>> "PA" ==  Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk> writes:

PA>    I don't see how that can make a difference.

JW> Suppose the user-supplied pattern is "foo\\|bar".  Inside nnmail-split-it,
JW> this becomes "...\\<\\(foo\\|bar\\>\\)".  The "\\>" now only applies to the
JW> "bar" alternative.

You are right, it is a bug.