From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9888 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Per Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: mbox quoting (was: Re: Gnus, movemail, POP3, trailing empty lines) Date: 11 Feb 1997 14:44:34 +0100 Organization: The Church of Emacs Sender: abraham@dina.kvl.dk Message-ID: References: <0fbu9soebf.fsf@fraxinus.daimi.aau.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149845 21154 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:37:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:37:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@ifi.uio.no Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id GAA29405 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 1997 06:03:18 -0800 Original-Received: from elc1.dina.kvl.dk (elc1.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.228]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id ; Tue, 11 Feb 1997 14:46:37 +0100 Original-Received: from zuse.dina.kvl.dk (zuse.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.245]) by elc1.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) with ESMTP id OAA04131; Tue, 11 Feb 1997 14:36:04 +0100 Original-Received: (abraham@localhost) by zuse.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) id OAA00760; Tue, 11 Feb 1997 14:44:34 +0100 Original-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen X-Face: +kRV2]2q}lixHkE{U)mY#+6]{AH=yN~S9@IFiOa@X6?GM|8MBp/ In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 11 Feb 1997 13:52:23 +0100 Original-Lines: 18 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.12/Emacs 19.34 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9888 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9888 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > People who use old software on new mboxes will see things like: > > She said: > > >>From the beginning of time > >man has yearned to destroy the sun. > > I think this may be called "additional damage". Right. My point was that the original would still be recoverable (by using the new algorithm). The message in the mbox does not change. In this way it is different than the Content-Length hack. If you use the old tools on that a CL-mbox, it could do unrecoverable damage to the mbox and the individual messages.