From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8639
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: nnmail-split-it problem
Date: 07 Nov 1996 12:33:20 +0100
Organization: The Church of Emacs
Sender: abraham@dina.kvl.dk
Message-ID: <rjg22mw35r.fsf@kolmogorov.dina.kvl.dk>
References: <yvtbudasstd.fsf@corona.pixar.com> <rvu3r249vi.fsf@sdnp5.ucsd.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148777 13435 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:19:37 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:19:37 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: (qmail 21247 invoked from smtpd); 7 Nov 1996 12:26:57 -0000
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2)
  by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 7 Nov 1996 12:26:55 -0000
Original-Received: from elc1.dina.kvl.dk (elc1.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.228]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <MAA03059@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Thu, 7 Nov 1996 12:33:29 +0100
Original-Received: from kolmogorov.dina.kvl.dk (kolmogorov.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.209]) by elc1.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) with ESMTP id MAA06824; Thu, 7 Nov 1996 12:26:44 +0100
Original-Received: (abraham@localhost) by kolmogorov.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) id MAA04030; Thu, 7 Nov 1996 12:33:20 +0100
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
X-Face: +kRV2]2q}lixHkE{U)mY#+6]{AH=yN~S9@IFiOa@X6?GM<U{B+4e{k79.Ya{~':DblFPCg$
 @60,BfLv2@SKZ19cMWK0/C'v;tM:|6B'R}U1rp6CL&kN({9<zF/V{:JCg27yC)9oZjeqcQawzKfiNL
 t9}`vjmK["dRQC/qGFQq"%u|Q`:6{"Rz}b(dnl_"3$Jtqimi>|8MBp/
In-Reply-To: David Moore's message of 06 Nov 1996 23:55:45 -0800
Original-Lines: 12
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.54/Emacs 19.34
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8639
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8639

>>>>> "DM" == David Moore <dmoore@UCSD.EDU> writes:

DM> 	I guess people might want to comment on whether this should be
DM> changed or not.  I'd be concerned about this sort of a change
DM> potentially breaking people's mail filing in unexpected ways.  But then
DM> again, it is a little strange.

Changing it would silently break useful documented behaviour.  If you
want to change it, you should add a `nnmail-split-fancy-not-so-fancy'
variable to do so, and the default should be the current behaviour.
Or perhaps add a new `nnmail-split-recursive' method for splitting
mail.