From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6642 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Per Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: miscellaneous Gnus problems/questions Date: 12 Jun 1996 09:42:50 +0200 Sender: abraham@dina.kvl.dk Message-ID: References: <199606120411.AAA17430@csb.bu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035147068 4300 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:51:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:51:08 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id BAA12702 for ; Wed, 12 Jun 1996 01:10:04 -0700 Original-Received: from elc1.dina.kvl.dk (elc1.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.228]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Wed, 12 Jun 1996 09:43:38 +0200 Original-Received: from kleene.dina.kvl.dk (kleene.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.223]) by elc1.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) with ESMTP id JAA05852; Wed, 12 Jun 1996 09:42:30 +0200 Original-Received: (abraham@localhost) by kleene.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) id JAA27237; Wed, 12 Jun 1996 09:42:51 +0200 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no X-Face: +kRV2]2q}lixHkE{U)mY#+6]{AH=yN~S9@IFiOa@X6?GM|8MBp/ In-Reply-To: jbw@cs.bu.edu's message of Wed, 12 Jun 1996 00:11:20 -0400 Original-Lines: 33 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.2.15/Emacs 19.31 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6642 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6642 >>>>> "JW" == Joe Wells writes: JW> 4. What does the name "eething" mean? Why "ee"? When I try to pronounce `nneething' is sounds just like `anything'. JW> 12. nnmail-split-it adds "\\<" and "\\>" around the patterns the user JW> supplies in nnmail-split-fancy. This breaks any patterns which don't JW> begin and end at word boundaries. This is undocumented. No, it is documented in the section about fancy mail splitting: Gnus> In these splits, FIELD must match a complete field name. VALUE must Gnus> match a complete word according to the fundamental mode syntax table. Gnus> You can use `.*' in the regexps to match partial field names or words. JW> It would be nice if this was optional. I think `.*' is easy enough to add the few places it is needed. JW> 13. "*" has word syntax in the article buffer. It has symbol syntax in Gnus 5.2. JW> 15. A bug in nnmail-split it: "\\>\\)" should be "\\)\\>". I don't see how that can make a difference. JW> 16. Editing a SCORE file directly doesn't get noticed. What does one have JW> to do to get the changes noticed by Gnus? gnus-score-flush-cache