From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/10493 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Per Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Splitting of ding@ifi Date: 03 Apr 1997 19:44:04 +0200 Organization: The Church of Emacs Sender: abraham@dina.kvl.dk Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035150355 24722 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:45:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:45:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@ifi.uio.no Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA03051 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 1997 09:58:44 -0800 Original-Received: from elc1.dina.kvl.dk (elc1.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.228]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Thu, 3 Apr 1997 19:46:04 +0200 Original-Received: from zuse.dina.kvl.dk (zuse.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.245]) by elc1.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) with ESMTP id TAA16635; Thu, 3 Apr 1997 19:34:53 +0200 Original-Received: (abraham@localhost) by zuse.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) id TAA02885; Thu, 3 Apr 1997 19:44:04 +0200 Original-To: Hrvoje Niksic X-Face: +kRV2]2q}lixHkE{U)mY#+6]{AH=yN~S9@IFiOa@X6?GM|8MBp/ In-Reply-To: Hrvoje Niksic's message of 03 Apr 1997 19:26:40 +0200 Original-Lines: 25 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.37/Emacs 19.34 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10493 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10493 Hrvoje Niksic writes: > Per Abrahamsen writes: > > > (| (any "ding@\\(ifi\\.uio\\.no\\|gnus\\.org\\)" "ding.gnus") > > Thanks. I think I'll have to use that. > > > ("x-from-line" "ding-request" "ding.gnus")) > > Do you mean to say that splitting on `X-From-Line' actually works for > you? It didn't use to, I don't remember why I added it. Maybe for `B r'. If I should choose between the `any' match and a working "x-from-line", I'd much prefer the former. The message I'm replying to right now is a good example of why. It has the following line: X-From-Line: hniksic@jagor.srce.hr Thu Apr 3 19:16:54 1997 Because you CC'ed it to me, and the CC arrived before the list copy. Thus, it would have ended in nnml:misc.misc, while the copy from the mailing list would still end up in nnml:duplicate.