From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/5388
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: abraham@dina.kvl.dk (Per Abrahamsen)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: enter-digest-group'ing
Date: 29 Feb 1996 19:20:33 +0100
Organization: The Church of Emacs
Sender: abraham@dina.kvl.dk
Message-ID: <rjivgqc7ta.fsf@ssv4.dina.kvl.dk>
References: <lvravg8lk8.fsf@ariel.pt.hk-r.se>
	<w8sg2bw6il3.fsf@eistla.ifi.uio.no>
	<ycqwx57vq5g.fsf_-_@fierce-bad-rabbit.MIT.EDU>
	<w8sravecxuz.fsf_-_@eistla.ifi.uio.no>
	<wo3f7umczi.fsf_-_@cheux.ecs.umass.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035145999 32643 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:33:19 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:33:19 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id KAA07719 for <steve@miranova.com>; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 10:51:50 -0800
Original-Received: from elc1.dina.kvl.dk (elc1.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.228]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <TAA27440@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 19:22:24 +0100
Original-Received: from ssv4.dina.kvl.dk (ssv4.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.223]) by elc1.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) with ESMTP id TAA29165; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 19:16:54 +0100
Original-Received: (abraham@localhost) by ssv4.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) id TAA20732; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 19:20:34 +0100
X-Face: +kRV2]2q}lixHkE{U)mY#+6]{AH=yN~S9@IFiOa@X6?GM<U{B+4e{k79.Ya{~':DblFPCg$
 @60,BfLv2@SKZ19cMWK0/C'v;tM:|6B'R}U1rp6CL&kN({9<zF/V{:JCg27yC)9oZjeqcQawzKfiNL
 t9}`vjmK["dRQC/qGFQq"%u|Q`:6{"Rz}b(dnl_"3$Jtqimi>|8MBp/
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: jvinson@cheux.ecs.umass.edu's message of 29 Feb 1996 09:18:41 -0500
Original-Lines: 22
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5388
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5388

>>>>> "JV" == Jack Vinson <jvinson@cheux.ecs.umass.edu> writes:

JV> Why can't mail digests be broken into their component articles and then
JV> treated as such?  RMail has a feature that splits the digest into
JV> individual messages and wipes the digest.  For mailing list, this seems
JV> like it would be the best way to go.  It would let us refer to an article
JV> directly and possibly see how it fits into a thread.

You can do this with the following three commands:

	C-d		split into digest
	M p a		mark all articles
	B c group RET	copy digested articles to `group'

It would be convenient with a function that would do this
automatically, especially if you could put such a function in the kill
file for digested groups like `comp.risk'.

E.g. comp.risk.KILL: 

	(gnus-split "nnml:comp.risk.undigestified")
	(gnus-expunge "U")