From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/10192 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Per Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Checking `Reply-To' Date: 11 Mar 1997 18:45:37 +0100 Organization: The Church of Emacs Sender: abraham@dina.kvl.dk Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035150102 22956 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:41:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:41:42 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA02733 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:04:53 -0800 Original-Received: from elc1.dina.kvl.dk (elc1.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.228]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 18:47:24 +0100 Original-Received: from zuse.dina.kvl.dk (zuse.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.245]) by elc1.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) with ESMTP id SAA00909; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 18:36:43 +0100 Original-Received: (abraham@localhost) by zuse.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) id SAA29001; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 18:45:37 +0100 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no X-Face: +kRV2]2q}lixHkE{U)mY#+6]{AH=yN~S9@IFiOa@X6?GM|8MBp/ In-Reply-To: Stainless Steel Rat's message of 11 Mar 1997 12:01:16 -0500 Original-Lines: 11 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.25/Emacs 19.34 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10192 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10192 Stainless Steel Rat writes: > No, From is the canonical mailbox of the originator (author) of the > message. I -- like many others -- have many email addresses that are equally valid from a technical point of view. I prefer one of them, which is the only thing that distinguish it from the others. My preferences (and these alone) thus makes it my "canonical" address. So we do not really disagree.