From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6308
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Is it 5.2 time yet?
Date: 21 May 1996 19:52:07 +0200
Sender: abraham@dina.kvl.dk
Message-ID: <rjohnhvrqw.fsf@babbage.dina.kvl.dk>
References: <x6u3xceimk.fsf@eyesore.no> <m2rasglf44.fsf@deanna.miranova.com>
	<x6ybmo7btw.fsf@eyesore.no> <m2d93yugfa.fsf@deanna.miranova.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146783 3256 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:46:23 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:46:23 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id LAA24069 for <steve@miranova.com>; Tue, 21 May 1996 11:43:24 -0700
Original-Received: from elc1.dina.kvl.dk (elc1.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.228]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <TAA05111@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Tue, 21 May 1996 19:59:24 +0200
Original-Received: from babbage.dina.kvl.dk (babbage.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.217]) by elc1.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) with ESMTP id TAA04363; Tue, 21 May 1996 19:50:34 +0200
Original-Received: (abraham@localhost) by babbage.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) id TAA16631; Tue, 21 May 1996 19:52:07 +0200
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
X-Face: +kRV2]2q}lixHkE{U)mY#+6]{AH=yN~S9@IFiOa@X6?GM<U{B+4e{k79.Ya{~':DblFPCg$
 @60,BfLv2@SKZ19cMWK0/C'v;tM:|6B'R}U1rp6CL&kN({9<zF/V{:JCg27yC)9oZjeqcQawzKfiNL
 t9}`vjmK["dRQC/qGFQq"%u|Q`:6{"Rz}b(dnl_"3$Jtqimi>|8MBp/
In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 21 May 1996 09:42:01 -0700
Original-Lines: 9
X-Mailer: September Gnus v0.89/Emacs 19.30
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6308
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6308

>>>>> "SLB" == Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com> writes:

SLB> Is the ``Gnus'' topic renameable?  I'd prefer to use that topic name
SLB> for groups uniquely dedicated to Gnus.

Yes, I have renamed it to "Topics".  I really think that should be the
default, it would both give new users a hint about what it was all
about, and make more sense than categorize everything as a subtopic of
"Gnus".