From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6128 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Per Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Suggestions Date: 04 May 1996 11:33:35 +0200 Sender: abraham@dina.kvl.dk Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146629 2650 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:43:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:43:49 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id DAA05367 for ; Sat, 4 May 1996 03:45:10 -0700 Original-Received: from maud.ifi.uio.no (0@maud.ifi.uio.no [129.240.74.2]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Sat, 4 May 1996 12:18:33 +0200 Original-Received: from elc1.dina.kvl.dk (elc1.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.228]) by maud.ifi.uio.no ; Sat, 4 May 1996 11:40:01 +0200 Original-Received: from babbage.dina.kvl.dk (babbage.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.217]) by elc1.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) with ESMTP id LAA19266; Sat, 4 May 1996 11:31:55 +0200 Original-Received: (abraham@localhost) by babbage.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) id LAA22083; Sat, 4 May 1996 11:33:35 +0200 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no X-Face: +kRV2]2q}lixHkE{U)mY#+6]{AH=yN~S9@IFiOa@X6?GM|8MBp/ In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 03 May 1996 23:11:10 -0700 Original-Lines: 6 X-Mailer: September Gnus v0.80/Emacs 19.30 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6128 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6128 >>>>> "SLB" == Steven L Baur writes: SLB> Is text/enriched preferred then instead of text/richtext? Yes, but they are not identical. See RFC 1896 for the latest definition of text/enriched.