From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/39530 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Per Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Generating Mail-Followup-To: headers Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 11:51:43 +0200 Organization: The Church of Emacs Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <87y9m9fs6b.fsf@squeaker.lickey.com> <87elo1exsd.fsf@squeaker.lickey.com> <87u1wvkaiv.fsf@mclinux.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035175227 28486 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:40:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:40:27 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 570 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2001 09:52:44 -0000 Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu (mail@129.7.128.13) by mastaler.com with SMTP; 20 Oct 2001 09:52:44 -0000 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 15usnt-0002El-00; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 04:52:29 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 20 Oct 2001 04:52:07 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id EAA19651 for ; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 04:51:54 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (qmail 566 invoked by alias); 20 Oct 2001 09:52:11 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 561 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2001 09:52:11 -0000 Original-Received: from sheridan.dina.kvl.dk (130.225.40.227) by gnus.org with SMTP; 20 Oct 2001 09:52:11 -0000 Original-Received: from ssv2.dina.kvl.dk (ssv2.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.226]) by sheridan.dina.kvl.dk (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id LAA26910; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 11:51:43 +0200 Original-Received: from abraham by ssv2.dina.kvl.dk with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 15usn9-000868-00; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 11:51:43 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: +kRV2]2q}lixHkE{U)mY#+6]{AH=yN~S9@IFiOa@X6?GM|8MBp/ In-Reply-To: (Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE's message of "Fri, 19 Oct 2001 19:51:47 +0200") Original-Lines: 15 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.106 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:39530 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:39530 Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Gro=DFjohann) writes: > What's so bad about using group parameters for this? When I have been talking about group parameters, I have always been imagining sending the mail from inside some folder (or with C-u a from the *Groups* buffer), and looking at the group parameters for the current group. In that case it is not robust, since you may send messages from outside folders, or from other folders than the one associated with the list. However, if we are talking about code that iterate through all the groups and note the (to-list / to-address), and compare that list with the to/cc in order to decide whether to generate mft header, that is an entirely different and much cooler case.