From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/7662
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: [rgnus feature request] Customization for nnmail-split-methods
Date: 19 Aug 1996 13:34:38 +0200
Organization: The Church of Emacs
Sender: abraham@dina.kvl.dk
Message-ID: <rjsp9jppyp.fsf@kolmogorov.dina.kvl.dk>
References: <yj9g25ol9i2.fsf@adobe.com> <x6loff5j3s.fsf@eyesore.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035147944 8087 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:05:44 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:05:44 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id FAA11478 for <steve@miranova.com>; Mon, 19 Aug 1996 05:08:53 -0700
Original-Received: from elc1.dina.kvl.dk (elc1.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.228]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <NAA06319@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Mon, 19 Aug 1996 13:34:22 +0200
Original-Received: from kolmogorov.dina.kvl.dk (kolmogorov.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.209]) by elc1.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) with ESMTP id NAA14502; Mon, 19 Aug 1996 13:30:43 +0200
Original-Received: (abraham@localhost) by kolmogorov.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) id NAA20637; Mon, 19 Aug 1996 13:34:39 +0200
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
X-Face: +kRV2]2q}lixHkE{U)mY#+6]{AH=yN~S9@IFiOa@X6?GM<U{B+4e{k79.Ya{~':DblFPCg$
 @60,BfLv2@SKZ19cMWK0/C'v;tM:|6B'R}U1rp6CL&kN({9<zF/V{:JCg27yC)9oZjeqcQawzKfiNL
 t9}`vjmK["dRQC/qGFQq"%u|Q`:6{"Rz}b(dnl_"3$Jtqimi>|8MBp/
In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 16 Aug 1996 19:33:59 +0200
Original-Lines: 9
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.32
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:7662
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:7662


Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no> writes:

> Well, the custom code may be totally rewritten some time in the future
> (right, Per?), so writing new stuff to use the current custom code is
> slightly iffy.

"Some time in the future" is vague enough for me, so I'd go along with
it.