From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/35946
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-1?q?=C6=D8=C5?= -- QP in subject
Date: 19 Apr 2001 17:03:29 +0200
Organization: The Church of Emacs
Message-ID: <rju23lylry.fsf@ssv2.dina.kvl.dk>
References: <3196664716389165@oakhurst.yi.org>
	<vafofttuq21.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<3196667051873244@oakhurst.yi.org>
	<vafu23ltabm.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<rj8zkx3yd4.fsf@ssv2.dina.kvl.dk> <87zodd5506.fsf@ait.uran.ru>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171615 5907 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:40:15 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:40:15 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@gnus.org>
Original-Received: (qmail 23908 invoked by alias); 19 Apr 2001 15:03:51 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 23903 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2001 15:03:51 -0000
Original-Received: from sheridan.dina.kvl.dk (130.225.40.227)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 19 Apr 2001 15:03:51 -0000
Original-Received: from ssv2.dina.kvl.dk (ssv2.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.226])
	by sheridan.dina.kvl.dk (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id RAA17737;
	Thu, 19 Apr 2001 17:03:29 +0200
Original-Received: from abraham by ssv2.dina.kvl.dk with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 14qFxx-0000eW-00; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 17:03:29 +0200
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
X-Face: +kRV2]2q}lixHkE{U)mY#+6]{AH=yN~S9@IFiOa@X6?GM<U{B+4e{k79.Ya{~':DblFPCg$
 @60,BfLv2@SKZ19cMWK0/C'v;tM:|6B'R}U1rp6CL&kN({9<zF/V{:JCg27yC)9oZjeqcQawzKfiNL
 t9}`vjmK["dRQC/qGFQq"%u|Q`:6{"Rz}b(dnl_"3$Jtqimi>|8MBp/
In-Reply-To: <87zodd5506.fsf@ait.uran.ru> (Dmitry Paduchih's message of "19 Apr 2001 20:38:33 +0600")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) Emacs/20.7
Original-Lines: 7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35946
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35946

Dmitry Paduchih <paduch@imm.uran.ru> writes:

> Well, probably it is a bad idea... But it would be worse idea to use
> unencoded UTF8 in the newsgroup or a mailing list where nobody uses it...

Yes, in the transition period using MIME encoded headers is the least
bad option.