From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/17246
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: pgnus 0.29 and quote coloring in message display
Date: 19 Sep 1998 20:43:40 +0200
Organization: The Church of Emacs
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <rju3247xk3.fsf@zuse.+dina.kvl.dk>
References: <199809161449.KAA26304@alderaan.gsfc.nasa.gov> <m37lz01ehs.fsf@sparky.gnus.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035155981 32379 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:19:41 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:19:41 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (gizmo.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.102.31])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA18012
	for <jason@mailhost.sclp.com>; Sat, 19 Sep 1998 14:44:32 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (sina.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.3.5]) by gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAF17216; Sat, 19 Sep 1998 13:15:33 -0500
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 19 Sep 1998 13:44:18 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA25178 for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Sat, 19 Sep 1998 13:44:00 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from sheridan.dina.kvl.dk (root@sheridan.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.227])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA17989
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Sat, 19 Sep 1998 14:43:51 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from zuse.dina.kvl.dk (zuse.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.245])
	by sheridan.dina.kvl.dk (8.9.0.Beta5/8.9.0.Beta5) with ESMTP id UAA24004;
	Sat, 19 Sep 1998 20:44:10 +0200
Original-Received: (abraham@localhost) by zuse.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) id UAA00700; Sat, 19 Sep 1998 20:43:40 +0200
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
X-Face: +kRV2]2q}lixHkE{U)mY#+6]{AH=yN~S9@IFiOa@X6?GM<U{B+4e{k79.Ya{~':DblFPCg$
 @60,BfLv2@SKZ19cMWK0/C'v;tM:|6B'R}U1rp6CL&kN({9<zF/V{:JCg27yC)9oZjeqcQawzKfiNL
 t9}`vjmK["dRQC/qGFQq"%u|Q`:6{"Rz}b(dnl_"3$Jtqimi>|8MBp/
Original-Lines: 11
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.42/Emacs 20.2
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:17246
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:17246

Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

> For instance, we could have properties `header', `body', `wash' and
> `highlight'.  The functions would be marked as to what they're meant
> to do (with `put'), and we'd have a function like

I think this would make it harder to learn how to write hook functions
in Gnus, for very little benefit.

You do not reduce program complexity by having fewer options, if each
option is more complex.