From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9794
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: nnmail-split-it
Date: 04 Feb 1997 09:37:25 +0100
Organization: The Church of Emacs
Sender: abraham@dina.kvl.dk
Message-ID: <rju3nt3r22.fsf@zuse.dina.kvl.dk>
References: <xofiv4aual5.fsf@blubb.pdc.kth.se> <rvraixqxkn.fsf@sdnp5.ucsd.edu> <r9q3evdpde3.fsf@snowking.cs.washington.edu> <m2raixpc6h.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149765 20601 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:36:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:36:05 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
	by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id BAA11730
	for <steve@miranova.com>; Tue, 4 Feb 1997 01:01:26 -0800
Original-Received: from elc1.dina.kvl.dk (elc1.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.228]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <JAA09374@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Tue, 4 Feb 1997 09:38:51 +0100
Original-Received: from zuse.dina.kvl.dk (zuse.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.245]) by elc1.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) with ESMTP id JAA23293; Tue, 4 Feb 1997 09:29:01 +0100
Original-Received: (abraham@localhost) by zuse.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) id JAA13948; Tue, 4 Feb 1997 09:37:25 +0100
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
X-Face: +kRV2]2q}lixHkE{U)mY#+6]{AH=yN~S9@IFiOa@X6?GM<U{B+4e{k79.Ya{~':DblFPCg$
 @60,BfLv2@SKZ19cMWK0/C'v;tM:|6B'R}U1rp6CL&kN({9<zF/V{:JCg27yC)9oZjeqcQawzKfiNL
 t9}`vjmK["dRQC/qGFQq"%u|Q`:6{"Rz}b(dnl_"3$Jtqimi>|8MBp/
In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 04 Feb 1997 02:55:34 +0100
Original-Lines: 9
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.10/Emacs 19.34
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9794
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9794

Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no> writes:

> The box I'm sitting with now is a 486/slow without NFS, and splitting
> is kinda slow here as well.

I really want to see some numbers before I believe the bottleneck is
in the lisp code, rather than in i/o (and in particular directory
synchronization).  Are you using Linux ext2fs?