From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6255
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Display glitches in sgnus 0.83 (II)
Date: 19 May 1996 19:04:04 +0200
Sender: abraham@dina.kvl.dk
Message-ID: <rjwx28wq63.fsf@babbage.dina.kvl.dk>
References: <m2zq7hafxe.fsf@deanna.miranova.com> <x6zq74ejfa.fsf@eyesore.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146737 3057 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:45:37 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:45:37 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id KAA19011 for <steve@miranova.com>; Sun, 19 May 1996 10:32:20 -0700
Original-Received: from elc1.dina.kvl.dk (elc1.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.228]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <TAA13628@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Sun, 19 May 1996 19:11:16 +0200
Original-Received: from babbage.dina.kvl.dk (babbage.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.217]) by elc1.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) with ESMTP id TAA23497; Sun, 19 May 1996 19:02:31 +0200
Original-Received: (abraham@localhost) by babbage.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) id TAA12168; Sun, 19 May 1996 19:04:04 +0200
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
X-Face: +kRV2]2q}lixHkE{U)mY#+6]{AH=yN~S9@IFiOa@X6?GM<U{B+4e{k79.Ya{~':DblFPCg$
 @60,BfLv2@SKZ19cMWK0/C'v;tM:|6B'R}U1rp6CL&kN({9<zF/V{:JCg27yC)9oZjeqcQawzKfiNL
 t9}`vjmK["dRQC/qGFQq"%u|Q`:6{"Rz}b(dnl_"3$Jtqimi>|8MBp/
In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 19 May 1996 18:07:05 +0200
Original-Lines: 10
X-Mailer: September Gnus v0.89/Emacs 19.30
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6255
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6255

>>>>> "LMI" == Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no> writes:

LMI> To deal with that properly, Gnus would have to do some MIME parsing,
LMI> which is something I'd rather not get into.  An easy hack would be to
LMI> set `gnus-signature-limit' to "^--Multipart" or something -- that way
LMI> signatures that contain that regexp wouldn't be hidden.  Is that nice,
LMI> though?

Very nice, especially if the regexp also recognized forwarded messages
and context diffs.