From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/54612 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bill White Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: can gnus-unread-mark be a ham mark? Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 11:53:07 -0600 Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <764qxr3356.fsf@newjersey.ppllc.com> <4n4qxqwxjm.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <4nr80t8id3.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <76n0bhxqbs.fsf@newjersey.ppllc.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1067622806 355 80.91.224.253 (31 Oct 2003 17:53:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 17:53:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M3153@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Oct 31 18:53:24 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AFdSd-00059r-00 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:53:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AFdSV-0008CI-00; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 11:53:15 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AFdSQ-0008CD-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 11:53:10 -0600 Original-Received: from wolfram.com (wri-dns0.wolfram.com [140.177.205.10]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 035853A004C for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 11:53:10 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from billw2lx.wolfram.com.wolfram.com (dmz5.wolfram.com [140.177.205.1]) by wolfram.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id h9VHr7M01783; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 11:53:08 -0600 Original-To: Jake Colman X-Phone: 217-398-0700 x 234 X-Fax: 217-398-0747 In-Reply-To: <76n0bhxqbs.fsf@newjersey.ppllc.com> (Jake Colman's message of "Fri, 31 Oct 2003 12:35:51 -0500") X-Liturgical-Date: Weekday: Friday of the Thirtieth Week of Ordinary Time User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54612 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54612 On Fri Oct 31 2003 at 11:35, Jake Colman said: >>>>>> "BW" == Bill White writes: > > BW> On Fri Oct 31 2003 at 10:47, Ted Zlatanov said: > >> That way, I go into my spam group, mark ham with `!', and just exit > >> the group. > > BW> [...] > > >> The ham-marked articles, namely the ticked ones, get moved to "mail" > >> and *unmarked* (this is the part I think you want), so they look > >> fresh and new. I don't use a ham-exit-processor on them currently. > > BW> Excellent - this is working for me now, and ticked makes even more > BW> sense to me than unmarked. Thanks! > > You could also have used the gnus-del-mark ('r') for the same thing, > right? Yes, that would work too, since gnus-del-mark is one of the default ham marks. It doesn't fit into the way I think about ham in a spam group, though - I like to do something to "rescue" the ham message, then later start a different process that begins with reading the message in the group where it belongs. Starting the reaading-thinking-replying process with the message still in a spam group disturbs me somehow. Ain't it amazing that gnus can be customized to this extent? Cheers - bw -- Bill White . billw@wolfram.com . http://members.wri.com/billw "No ma'am, we're musicians."