From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9236
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: David Moore <dmoore@UCSD.EDU>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: NoCeM flakiness in 0.74 and higher
Date: 17 Dec 1996 12:28:22 -0800
Sender: dmoore@sdnp5.ucsd.edu
Message-ID: <rv4thk6hll.fsf@sdnp5.ucsd.edu>
References: <yvia20cpauh3.fsf@atreides.mindspring.com> <m2ohfthtgr.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149290 17241 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:28:10 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:28:10 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
          by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id MAA28977 for <steve@miranova.com>; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 12:54:38 -0800
Original-Received: from UCSD.EDU (mailbox1.ucsd.edu [132.239.1.53]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <VAA03203@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 21:30:16 +0100
Original-Received: from sdnp5.ucsd.edu (sdnp5.ucsd.edu [132.239.79.10]) by UCSD.EDU (8.8.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id MAA10164 for <ding@ifi.uio.no>; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 12:30:13 -0800 (PST)
Original-Received: by sdnp5.ucsd.edu (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id MAA08793; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 12:28:23 -0800
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
X-Face: "oX;zS#-JU$-,WKSzG.1gGE]x^cIg!hW.dq>.f6pzS^A+(k!T|M:}5{_%>Io<>L&{hO7W4cicOQ|>/lZ1G(m%7iaCf,6Qgk0%%Bz7b2-W3jd0m_UG\Y;?]}4s0O-U)uox>P3JN)9cm]O\@,vy2e{`3pb!"pqmRy3peB90*2L
In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 17 Dec 1996 20:16:36 +0100
Original-Lines: 21
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.75/XEmacs 19.15
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9236
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9236

Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no> writes:

> Sudish Joseph <sudish@mindspring.com> writes:
> Can't you just remove a.n.m from `gnus-nocem-groups'?
> 
> > In particular, it'd be neat if one could have an alist that let you
> > specify the type of score entry you want generated for articles
> > that're being eliminated by nocem.  A followup entry (I.e., low score
> > on references) would be the most useful.
> 
> Yes, that would be useful.  It might be tricky to implement in an
> efficient fashion, though.

	If you just want to _hide_ followups rather than score them, I
mailed a semi-patch to do this to the ding list last week.

-- 
David Moore <dmoore@ucsd.edu>       | Computer Systems Lab      __o
UCSD Dept. Computer Science - 0114  | Work: (619) 534-8604    _ \<,_
La Jolla, CA 92093-0114             | Fax:  (619) 534-1445   (_)/ (_)
<URL:http://oj.egbt.org/dmoore/>    | In a cloud bones of steel.