From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9071 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Moore Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Problem with nnvirtual in 0.72? Date: 02 Dec 1996 22:00:28 -0800 Sender: dmoore@sdnp5.ucsd.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149152 16328 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:25:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:25:52 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 29654 invoked from smtpd); 3 Dec 1996 06:20:30 -0000 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2) by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 3 Dec 1996 06:20:29 -0000 Original-Received: from UCSD.EDU (mailbox2.ucsd.edu [132.239.1.54]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Tue, 3 Dec 1996 07:01:58 +0100 Original-Received: from sdnp5.ucsd.edu (sdnp5.ucsd.edu [132.239.79.10]) by UCSD.EDU (8.8.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id WAA10650 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 1996 22:01:56 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by sdnp5.ucsd.edu (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id WAA11606; Mon, 2 Dec 1996 22:00:29 -0800 Original-To: "(ding) Gnus Mailing List" In-Reply-To: Jason L Tibbitts III's message of 02 Dec 1996 16:48:54 -0600 Original-Lines: 33 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.72/XEmacs 19.14 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9071 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9071 Jason L Tibbitts III writes: > Unfortunately after I upgraded to 0.72 I found that after reading all of > the articles in the group and calling gnus-group-get-new-news the unread > article count would be some large number (like 1300, I assume the sum of > (max - min article) for each group). It seems that it's losing the list of > read articles, even though a long list shows up in the group info. > > Has anyone seen this? I'm not submitting this as a bug report because I > could be screwing something up and since I don't really know where to start > looking it would be a pretty pitiful bug report. I haven't seen it yet. If you weren't seeing the problem in 0.70, maybe it's related to the other mysterious group count bug. Although, you know, I do seem to vaguely recall all something like what you just described happening to me recently. ie, the group info seemed correct but the display was for the whole group. Maybe it was on an nndir of the gnus-bugs archive, when ange-ftp got flakey? Hah, that's even worse bug report. :) Questions: 1) Do you read the component groups seperately from the virtual group? 2) If so, do you have nnvirtual-always-rescan set to t? 3) Do you have the component groups before, after, or both to the virtual group in the *Group* buffer. -- David Moore | Computer Systems Lab __o UCSD Dept. Computer Science - 0114 | Work: (619) 534-8604 _ \<,_ La Jolla, CA 92093-0114 | Fax: (619) 534-1445 (_)/ (_) | Solo Furnace Creek 508 -- 1996!